diff mbox

[1/7] arm64: introduce common ESR_ELx_* definitions

Message ID 1420632260-8798-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Mark Rutland Jan. 7, 2015, 12:04 p.m. UTC
Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
and their naming is misleading.

This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:

* Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
  replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
  architectural intent.

* ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
  EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
  ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.

* Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.

* UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.

* Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.

For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

Comments

Catalin Marinas Jan. 7, 2015, 4:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> and their naming is misleading.
> 
> This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> 
> * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
>   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
>   architectural intent.
> 
> * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
>   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
>   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> 
> * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> 
> * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> 
> * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> 
> For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

I assume this series would go in via the kvm tree. In which case, for
the first two patches in the series:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Mark Rutland Jan. 7, 2015, 4:42 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:23:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> > the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> > the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> > ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> > and their naming is misleading.
> > 
> > This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> > cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> > users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> > 
> > * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
> >   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
> >   architectural intent.
> > 
> > * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
> >   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
> >   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> > 
> > * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> > 
> > * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> > 
> > * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> > 
> > For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> > for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 
> I assume this series would go in via the kvm tree. In which case, for
> the first two patches in the series:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks!

Patches 3 and 4 also affect the arm64 core code and shouldn't affect
KVM. Can I get your ack for those too, or do you have any comments?

Mark.
Catalin Marinas Jan. 7, 2015, 4:57 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:42:04PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:23:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> > > the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> > > the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> > > ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> > > and their naming is misleading.
> > > 
> > > This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> > > cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> > > users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> > > 
> > > * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
> > >   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
> > >   architectural intent.
> > > 
> > > * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
> > >   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
> > >   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> > > 
> > > * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> > > 
> > > * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> > > 
> > > * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> > > 
> > > For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> > > for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > 
> > I assume this series would go in via the kvm tree. In which case, for
> > the first two patches in the series:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Patches 3 and 4 also affect the arm64 core code and shouldn't affect
> KVM. Can I get your ack for those too, or do you have any comments?

They look fine to me. For the first 4 patches:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

(BTW, I'll start preparing the merging window next week, if we get
conflicts, we may need to put the first 4 patches on some common branch;
I don't expect any though)
Mark Rutland Jan. 7, 2015, 6:49 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:57:53PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:42:04PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:23:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> > > > the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> > > > the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> > > > ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> > > > and their naming is misleading.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> > > > cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> > > > users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> > > > 
> > > > * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
> > > >   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
> > > >   architectural intent.
> > > > 
> > > > * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
> > > >   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
> > > >   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> > > > 
> > > > * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> > > > 
> > > > * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> > > > 
> > > > * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> > > > 
> > > > For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> > > > for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > I assume this series would go in via the kvm tree. In which case, for
> > > the first two patches in the series:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Patches 3 and 4 also affect the arm64 core code and shouldn't affect
> > KVM. Can I get your ack for those too, or do you have any comments?
> 
> They look fine to me. For the first 4 patches:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks.

> (BTW, I'll start preparing the merging window next week, if we get
> conflicts, we may need to put the first 4 patches on some common branch;
> I don't expect any though)

Noted. I'll keep an eye out.

Mark.
Christoffer Dall Jan. 11, 2015, 4:59 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> and their naming is misleading.
> 
> This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> 
> * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
>   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
>   architectural intent.
> 
> * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
>   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
>   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> 
> * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> 
> * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> 
> * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> 
> For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> index 72674f4..eaee379 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> @@ -54,4 +54,82 @@
>  #define ESR_EL1_EC_BKPT32	(0x38)
>  #define ESR_EL1_EC_BRK64	(0x3C)
>  
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN	(0x00)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_WFx		(0x01)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x02 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32	(0x03)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_64	(0x04)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_MR	(0x05)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_LS	(0x06)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD	(0x07)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP10_ID	(0x08)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x09 - 0x0B */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_64	(0x0C)
> +/* Unallocated: 0x0d */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_ILL		(0x0E)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x0F - 0x10 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SVC32	(0x11)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32	(0x12)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32	(0x13)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x14 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SVC64	(0x15)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64	(0x16)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64	(0x17)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64	(0x18)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x19 - 0x1E */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_IMP_DEF	(0x1f)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW	(0x20)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR	(0x21)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_PC_ALIGN	(0x22)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x23 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW	(0x24)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR	(0x25)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SP_ALIGN	(0x26)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x27 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_EXC32	(0x28)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x29 - 0x2B */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_EXC64	(0x2C)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x2D - 0x2E */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SERROR	(0x2F)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_BREAKPT_LOW	(0x30)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_BREAKPT_CUR	(0x31)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW	(0x32)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_CUR	(0x33)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_LOW	(0x34)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_CUR	(0x35)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x36 - 0x37 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_BKPT32	(0x38)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x39 */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_VECTOR32	(0x3A)
> +/* Unallocted EC: 0x3B */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64	(0x3C)
> +/* Unallocated EC: 0x3D - 0x3F */
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_MAX		(0x3F)
> +
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT	(26)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EC_MASK		(UL(0x3F) << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define ESR_ELx_IL		(UL(1) << 25)
> +#define ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK	(ESR_ELx_IL - 1)
> +#define ESR_ELx_ISV		(UL(1) << 24)
> +#define ESR_ELx_SAS		(UL(1) << 22)

shouldn't this be UL(3) << 22 (or a mask/shift equivalend declaration)?

> +#define ESR_ELx_SSE		(UL(1) << 21)
> +#define ESR_ELx_SRT_SHIFT	(16)
> +#define ESR_ELx_SRT_MASK	(UL(0x1F) << ESR_ELx_SRT_SHIFT)
> +#define ESR_ELx_SF 		(UL(1) << 15)
> +#define ESR_ELx_AR 		(UL(1) << 14)
> +#define ESR_ELx_EA 		(UL(1) << 9)
> +#define ESR_ELx_CM 		(UL(1) << 8)
> +#define ESR_ELx_S1PTW 		(UL(1) << 7)
> +#define ESR_ELx_WNR		(UL(1) << 6)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC		(0x3F)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE	(0x3C)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM	(0x0F)

this should be 0x0C right?

> +#define ESR_ELx_CV		(UL(1) << 24)
> +#define ESR_ELx_COND_SHIFT	(20)
> +#define ESR_ELx_COND_MASK	(UL(0xF) << ESR_ELx_COND_SHIFT)
> +#define ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE	(UL(1) << 0)
> +
>  #endif /* __ASM_ESR_H */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
Mark Rutland Jan. 12, 2015, 11:20 a.m. UTC | #6
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 04:59:06PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently we have separate ESR_EL{1,2}_* macros, despite the fact that
> > the encodings are common. While encodings are architected to refer to
> > the current EL or a lower EL, the macros refer to particular ELs (e.g.
> > ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_EL0). Having these duplicate definitions is redundant,
> > and their naming is misleading.
> > 
> > This patch introduces common ESR_ELx_* macros that can be used in all
> > cases, in preparation for later patches which will migrate existing
> > users over. Some additional cleanups are made in the process:
> > 
> > * Suffixes for particular exception levelts (e.g. _EL0, _EL1) are
> >   replaced with more general _LOW and _CUR suffixes, matching the
> >   architectural intent.
> > 
> > * ESR_ELx_EC_WFx, rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI is introduced, as this
> >   EC encoding covers traps from both WFE and WFI. Similarly,
> >   ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE rather than ESR_ELx_EC_WFI_ISS_WFE is introduced.
> > 
> > * Multi-bit fields are given consistently named _SHIFT and _MASK macros.
> > 
> > * UL() is used for compatiblity with assembly files.
> > 
> > * Comments are added for currently unallocated ESR_ELx.EC encodings.
> > 
> > For fields other than ESR_ELx.EC, macros are only implemented for fields
> > for which there is already an ESR_EL{1,2}_* macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

[...]

> > +#define ESR_ELx_IL		(UL(1) << 25)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK	(ESR_ELx_IL - 1)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_ISV		(UL(1) << 24)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_SAS		(UL(1) << 22)
> 
> shouldn't this be UL(3) << 22 (or a mask/shift equivalend declaration)?

Yes, it should.

[...]

> > +#define ESR_ELx_FSC		(0x3F)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE	(0x3C)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
> > +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM	(0x0F)
> 
> this should be 0x0C right?

Yes.

Thanks for spotting these! I've fixed them up locally and I'll give the
rest another once-over before I post v2.

Mark.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
index 72674f4..eaee379 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
@@ -54,4 +54,82 @@ 
 #define ESR_EL1_EC_BKPT32	(0x38)
 #define ESR_EL1_EC_BRK64	(0x3C)
 
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN	(0x00)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_WFx		(0x01)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x02 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32	(0x03)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_64	(0x04)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_MR	(0x05)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_LS	(0x06)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD	(0x07)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP10_ID	(0x08)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x09 - 0x0B */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_64	(0x0C)
+/* Unallocated: 0x0d */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_ILL		(0x0E)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x0F - 0x10 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SVC32	(0x11)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32	(0x12)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32	(0x13)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x14 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SVC64	(0x15)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64	(0x16)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64	(0x17)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64	(0x18)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x19 - 0x1E */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_IMP_DEF	(0x1f)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW	(0x20)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR	(0x21)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_PC_ALIGN	(0x22)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x23 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW	(0x24)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR	(0x25)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SP_ALIGN	(0x26)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x27 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_EXC32	(0x28)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x29 - 0x2B */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_FP_EXC64	(0x2C)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x2D - 0x2E */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SERROR	(0x2F)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_BREAKPT_LOW	(0x30)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_BREAKPT_CUR	(0x31)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW	(0x32)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_CUR	(0x33)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_LOW	(0x34)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_CUR	(0x35)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x36 - 0x37 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_BKPT32	(0x38)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x39 */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_VECTOR32	(0x3A)
+/* Unallocted EC: 0x3B */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64	(0x3C)
+/* Unallocated EC: 0x3D - 0x3F */
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_MAX		(0x3F)
+
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT	(26)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC_MASK		(UL(0x3F) << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT)
+
+#define ESR_ELx_IL		(UL(1) << 25)
+#define ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK	(ESR_ELx_IL - 1)
+#define ESR_ELx_ISV		(UL(1) << 24)
+#define ESR_ELx_SAS		(UL(1) << 22)
+#define ESR_ELx_SSE		(UL(1) << 21)
+#define ESR_ELx_SRT_SHIFT	(16)
+#define ESR_ELx_SRT_MASK	(UL(0x1F) << ESR_ELx_SRT_SHIFT)
+#define ESR_ELx_SF 		(UL(1) << 15)
+#define ESR_ELx_AR 		(UL(1) << 14)
+#define ESR_ELx_EA 		(UL(1) << 9)
+#define ESR_ELx_CM 		(UL(1) << 8)
+#define ESR_ELx_S1PTW 		(UL(1) << 7)
+#define ESR_ELx_WNR		(UL(1) << 6)
+#define ESR_ELx_FSC		(0x3F)
+#define ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE	(0x3C)
+#define ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT	(0x10)
+#define ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT	(0x04)
+#define ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM	(0x0F)
+#define ESR_ELx_CV		(UL(1) << 24)
+#define ESR_ELx_COND_SHIFT	(20)
+#define ESR_ELx_COND_MASK	(UL(0xF) << ESR_ELx_COND_SHIFT)
+#define ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE	(UL(1) << 0)
+
 #endif /* __ASM_ESR_H */