diff mbox

[v3,3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings

Message ID 1421060278-27329-4-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Boris BREZILLON Jan. 12, 2015, 10:57 a.m. UTC
at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
"atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi  | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi     | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi     | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Felipe Balbi Jan. 12, 2015, 6:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
#177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
+       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },

WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
#178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
+       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },

please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
Acked-by since he's already given it ?

Thanks
Boris BREZILLON Jan. 12, 2015, 7:18 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Felipe,

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> 
> WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> +       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> 
> WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> +       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> 
> please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> Acked-by since he's already given it ?

Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
(where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.

Thanks,

Boris
Felipe Balbi Jan. 12, 2015, 7:31 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> 
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > 
> > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> > +       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> > 
> > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> > +       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> > 
> > please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> > Acked-by since he's already given it ?
> 
> Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
> (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.

heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad.
Boris BREZILLON Jan. 12, 2015, 7:42 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:26 -0600
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> > 
> > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
> > Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > > > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > > 
> > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > > #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> > > +       { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> > > 
> > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > > #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> > > +       { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> > > 
> > > please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> > > Acked-by since he's already given it ?
> > 
> > Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
> > (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.
> 
> heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad.
> 

You took v3 of the first patch instead of v4.
Don't know if you can replace it (anyway, that's not such a big deal
since the only change is the commit message)...
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi
index 2a8da8a..acd90eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ 
 			usb2: gadget@fff78000 {
 				#address-cells = <1>;
 				#size-cells = <0>;
-				compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc";
+				compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc";
 				reg = <0x00600000 0x80000
 				       0xfff78000 0x400>;
 				interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
index bbb3ba6..d213147 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ 
 			usb2: gadget@f803c000 {
 				#address-cells = <1>;
 				#size-cells = <0>;
-				compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc";
+				compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc";
 				reg = <0x00500000 0x80000
 				       0xf803c000 0x400>;
 				interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi
index 5f4144d..2b407a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi
@@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ 
 		usb0: gadget@00500000 {
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc";
+			compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc";
 			reg = <0x00500000 0x100000
 			       0xf8030000 0x4000>;
 			interrupts = <33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 2>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
index 1b0f30c..52dce24 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ 
 		usb0: gadget@00400000 {
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <0>;
-			compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc";
+			compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc";
 			reg = <0x00400000 0x100000
 			       0xfc02c000 0x4000>;
 			interrupts = <47 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 2>;