Message ID | 1422598209-5999-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Ricardo, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 and 2 bytes per word, the transfer of the 3 last bytes will access > memory outside rx_ptr. > > Although this has not trigger any error on real hardware, we should > better fix this. > > Fixes: 24ba5e593f391507 Remove rx_fn and tx_fn pointer > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > index 2ca55f6..a1b664d 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > @@ -97,11 +97,26 @@ struct xilinx_spi { > > static void xilinx_spi_tx(struct xilinx_spi *xspi) > { > + u32 data = 0; > + > if (!xspi->tx_ptr) { > xspi->write_fn(0, xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); > return; > } > - xspi->write_fn(*(u32 *)(xspi->tx_ptr), xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); > + > + switch (xspi->bytes_per_word) { > + case 1: > + data = *(u8 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); > + break; > + case 2: > + data = *(u16 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); > + break; > + case 4: > + data = *(u32 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); > + break; > + } > + > + xspi->write_fn(data, xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); Is this endian-safe? > xspi->tx_ptr += xspi->bytes_per_word; > } Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On 30 Jan 2015 11:06, "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Is this endian-safe? As endianness safe as the original code, but there is also an issue. It is using rx_ptr. I am away until Sunday. So I cannot make a new patch until then. I tried to make this patch before leaving in the morning and was obviously a mistake. Again, Sorry for the mess this is really embarrassing. Regards > xspi->tx_ptr += xspi->bytes_per_word; > > } > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- > geert@linux-m68k.org <javascript:;> > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. > But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like > that. > -- Linus Torvalds >
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c index 2ca55f6..a1b664d 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c @@ -97,11 +97,26 @@ struct xilinx_spi { static void xilinx_spi_tx(struct xilinx_spi *xspi) { + u32 data = 0; + if (!xspi->tx_ptr) { xspi->write_fn(0, xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); return; } - xspi->write_fn(*(u32 *)(xspi->tx_ptr), xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); + + switch (xspi->bytes_per_word) { + case 1: + data = *(u8 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); + break; + case 2: + data = *(u16 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); + break; + case 4: + data = *(u32 *)(xspi->rx_ptr); + break; + } + + xspi->write_fn(data, xspi->regs + XSPI_TXD_OFFSET); xspi->tx_ptr += xspi->bytes_per_word; }
On 1 and 2 bytes per word, the transfer of the 3 last bytes will access memory outside rx_ptr. Although this has not trigger any error on real hardware, we should better fix this. Fixes: 24ba5e593f391507 Remove rx_fn and tx_fn pointer Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)