Message ID | 1427129424-17175-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:50:24PM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On some platforms, the low level PM code may not be initialized correctly for > a specific cpu. In this case, the EXNIO tells the cpuidle driver to not "-ENXIO", but honestly these sentences should be rewritten, I understand what you mean, but for someone who has not reviewed the code before this log means precious little. "If the cpuidle init cpu operation returns -ENXIO, therefore reporting HW failure or misconfiguration, the CPUidle driver skips the respective cpuidle device initialization because the associated platform back-end HW is not operational". > initialize the cpuidle device as the associated low level PM is not operational. > > That prevents the system to crash and allows to handle the error gracefully. > > For example, on Qcom's platform, each core has a SPM. The device associated > with this SPM is initialized before the cpuidle framework. If there is an error > in the initialization (eg. error in the DT), the system continues to boot but > in degraded mode as some SPM may not be correctly initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c > index 1c94b88..a7a01ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <asm/cpuidle.h> > > @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) > { > int cpu, ret; > struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm_idle_driver; > + struct cpuidle_device *dev; > > /* > * Initialize idle states data, starting at index 1. > @@ -105,18 +107,58 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) > if (ret <= 0) > return ret ? : -ENODEV; > > + ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > /* > * Call arch CPU operations in order to initialize > * idle states suspend back-end specific data > */ > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); > + > + /* > + * Do not register the cpuidle device. This situation could > + * happen when the low level PM was not able to initialize > + * for any reaon. s/reaon/reason. I disagree, it is not for *any* reason. Something like: /* * Skip the cpuidle device initialization if the reported failure * is a HW misconfiguration/breakage (-ENXIO). */ arm_cpuidle_init() should be documented in this respect. > + */ > + if (ret == -ENXIO) > + continue; > + > if (ret) { > pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu); > - return ret; > + goto out_fail; > + } > + > + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dev) { > + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n"); > + goto out_fail; > + } > + dev->cpu = cpu; > + > + ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n", > + cpu); > + kfree(dev); > + goto out_fail; > } > } > > - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL); > + return 0; > +out_fail: > + while (--cpu >= 0) { > + dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu); > + cpuidle_unregister_device(dev); > + kfree(dev); > + } > + > + cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv); > + > + return ret; > } > device_initcall(arm_idle_init); With the changes requested: Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c index 1c94b88..a7a01ce 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> #include <asm/cpuidle.h> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) { int cpu, ret; struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm_idle_driver; + struct cpuidle_device *dev; /* * Initialize idle states data, starting at index 1. @@ -105,18 +107,58 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) if (ret <= 0) return ret ? : -ENODEV; + ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv); + if (ret) { + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n"); + return ret; + } + /* * Call arch CPU operations in order to initialize * idle states suspend back-end specific data */ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); + + /* + * Do not register the cpuidle device. This situation could + * happen when the low level PM was not able to initialize + * for any reaon. + */ + if (ret == -ENXIO) + continue; + if (ret) { pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu); - return ret; + goto out_fail; + } + + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev) { + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n"); + goto out_fail; + } + dev->cpu = cpu; + + ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev); + if (ret) { + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n", + cpu); + kfree(dev); + goto out_fail; } } - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL); + return 0; +out_fail: + while (--cpu >= 0) { + dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu); + cpuidle_unregister_device(dev); + kfree(dev); + } + + cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv); + + return ret; } device_initcall(arm_idle_init);
On some platforms, the low level PM code may not be initialized correctly for a specific cpu. In this case, the EXNIO tells the cpuidle driver to not initialize the cpuidle device as the associated low level PM is not operational. That prevents the system to crash and allows to handle the error gracefully. For example, on Qcom's platform, each core has a SPM. The device associated with this SPM is initialized before the cpuidle framework. If there is an error in the initialization (eg. error in the DT), the system continues to boot but in degraded mode as some SPM may not be correctly initialized. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)