| Message ID | 1430838729-21572-4-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Rafael, Any comments on this patch? Thanks, Suravee On 5/5/2015 10:12 AM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, > need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and > acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. > > This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device > property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate > interface based on the booting architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > --- > drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c > index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/property.c > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #include <linux/export.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/property.h> > > /** > @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev) > return count; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count); > + > +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev) > +{ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) > + return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node); > + else if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) > + return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode)); > + > + return false; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_dma_is_coherent); > diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h > index de8bdf4..76ebde9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/property.h > +++ b/include/linux/property.h > @@ -164,4 +164,6 @@ struct property_set { > > void device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, struct property_set *pset); > > +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev); > + > #endif /* _LINUX_PROPERTY_H_ */ >
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Any comments on this patch? Well, as long as acpi_dma_is_coherent() does the right thing on all architectures, I have no objections. Thanks, Rafael > On 5/5/2015 10:12 AM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> >> Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, >> need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and >> acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. >> >> This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device >> property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate >> interface based on the booting architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c >> index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/property.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ >> #include <linux/export.h> >> #include <linux/kernel.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h> >> #include <linux/property.h> >> >> /** >> @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct >> device *dev) >> return count; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count); >> + >> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) >> + return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node); >> + else if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) >> + return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode)); >> + >> + return false; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_dma_is_coherent); >> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h >> index de8bdf4..76ebde9 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/property.h >> +++ b/include/linux/property.h >> @@ -164,4 +164,6 @@ struct property_set { >> >> void device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, struct property_set >> *pset); >> >> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev); >> + >> #endif /* _LINUX_PROPERTY_H_ */ >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/property.c +++ b/drivers/base/property.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/property.h> /** @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev) return count; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count); + +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) + return of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node); + else if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) + return acpi_dma_is_coherent(acpi_node(dev->fwnode)); + + return false; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_dma_is_coherent); diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h index de8bdf4..76ebde9 100644 --- a/include/linux/property.h +++ b/include/linux/property.h @@ -164,4 +164,6 @@ struct property_set { void device_add_property_set(struct device *dev, struct property_set *pset); +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev); + #endif /* _LINUX_PROPERTY_H_ */
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate interface based on the booting architecture. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> --- drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++ include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)