From patchwork Wed Oct 21 13:44:04 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ludovic Desroches X-Patchwork-Id: 7456821 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10589F37F for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55D6208C1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB7D4208B3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Zoth7-0000CB-Ql; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:44:45 +0000 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Zoth0-0008Th-3c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:44:39 +0000 Received: from ibiza.corp.atmel.com (10.161.101.13) by eusmtp01.atmel.com (10.161.101.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:12 +0200 From: Ludovic Desroches To: Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: at91: manage unexpected RXRDY flag when starting a transfer Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:44:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1445435048-25889-2-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: <1445435048-25889-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> References: <1445435048-25889-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20151021_064438_667595_7A5C9537 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.86 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peda@lysator.liu.se, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ludovic Desroches , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP In some cases, we could start a new i2c transfer with the RXRDY flag set. It is not a clean state and it leads to print annoying error messages even if there no real issue. The cause is only having garbage data in the Receive Holding Register because of a weird behavior of the RXRDY flag. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches Fixes: 93563a6a71bb ("i2c: at91: fix a race condition when using the DMA controller") Reported-by: Peter Rosin Tested-by: Peter Rosin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.1 --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c index 94c087b..bac0016 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c @@ -347,8 +347,14 @@ error: static void at91_twi_read_next_byte(struct at91_twi_dev *dev) { - if (!dev->buf_len) + /* + * If we are in this case, it means there is garbage data in RHR, so + * delete them. + */ + if (!dev->buf_len) { + at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_RHR); return; + } /* 8bit read works with and without FIFO */ *dev->buf = readb_relaxed(dev->base + AT91_TWI_RHR); @@ -465,6 +471,24 @@ static irqreturn_t atmel_twi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) if (!irqstatus) return IRQ_NONE; + /* + * In reception, the behavior of the twi device (before sama5d2) is + * weird. There is some magic about RXRDY flag! When a data has been + * almost received, the reception of a new one is anticipated if there + * is no stop command to send. That is the reason why ask for sending + * the stop command not on the last data but on the second last one. + * + * Unfortunately, we could still have the RXRDY flag set even if the + * transfer is done and we have read the last data. It might happen + * when the i2c slave device sends too quickly data after receiving the + * ack from the master. The data has been almost received before having + * the order to send stop. In this case, sending the stop command could + * cause a RXRDY interrupt with a TXCOMP one. It is better to manage + * the RXRDY interrupt first in order to not keep garbage data in the + * Receive Holding Register for the next transfer. + */ + if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) + at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev); /* * When a NACK condition is detected, the I2C controller sets the NACK, @@ -507,8 +531,6 @@ static irqreturn_t atmel_twi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) if (irqstatus & (AT91_TWI_TXCOMP | AT91_TWI_NACK)) { at91_disable_twi_interrupts(dev); complete(&dev->cmd_complete); - } else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) { - at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev); } else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY) { at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev); } @@ -600,11 +622,6 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev) } else if (dev->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) { unsigned start_flags = AT91_TWI_START; - if (sr & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) { - dev_err(dev->dev, "RXRDY still set!"); - at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_RHR); - } - /* if only one byte is to be read, immediately stop transfer */ if (!has_alt_cmd && dev->buf_len <= 1 && !(dev->msg->flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN))