Message ID | 1461770664-29384-1-git-send-email-kernel@martin.sperl.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
kernel@martin.sperl.org writes: > From: Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org> > > The bcm2835 firmware enables several clocks and plls before > booting the linux kernel. > > These plls should never get disabled as it may result in a > stopped system clock and more. > > So during probing we check if the clock is enabled > and if it is then mark that clock with CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF. > As a consequence this will also enable the corresponding > parent plls and pll-divs. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org> > > -- > --- > drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > index 35f8de7..65d62c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c > @@ -1251,7 +1251,14 @@ static struct clk *bcm2835_register_clock(struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman, > init.flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE; > } > > + /* if the clock is running then enable HAND_OFF */ > + if (cprman_read(cprman, data->ctl_reg) & CM_ENABLE) { > + dev_info(cprman->dev, > + "found enabled clock %s - enabling hand off\n", > + data->name); > + init.flags |= CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF; > + } > + The debug shouldn't be at dev_info() level, but other than that this seems like a good plan once CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF lands.
> On 28.04.2016, at 22:22, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote: > > kernel@martin.sperl.org writes: > >> From: Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org> >> >> The bcm2835 firmware enables several clocks and plls before >> booting the linux kernel. >> >> These plls should never get disabled as it may result in a >> stopped system clock and more. >> >> So during probing we check if the clock is enabled >> and if it is then mark that clock with CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF. >> As a consequence this will also enable the corresponding >> parent plls and pll-divs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org> >> >> -- > >> --- >> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c >> index 35f8de7..65d62c2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c >> @@ -1251,7 +1251,14 @@ static struct clk *bcm2835_register_clock(struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman, >> init.flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE; >> } >> >> + /* if the clock is running then enable HAND_OFF */ >> + if (cprman_read(cprman, data->ctl_reg) & CM_ENABLE) { >> + dev_info(cprman->dev, >> + "found enabled clock %s - enabling hand off\n", >> + data->name); >> + init.flags |= CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF; >> + } >> + > > The debug shouldn't be at dev_info() level, but other than that this > seems like a good plan once CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF lands. Until that point in time we can make those clocks critical. I could split it into a 2 part patch first with critical and when we have hand off then we can apply the second part that moves to hand-off. That way the current issue is solved - even if in a sub-optimal way. But the path forward is shown. Should I do this? Martin
diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c index 35f8de7..65d62c2 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c @@ -1251,7 +1251,14 @@ static struct clk *bcm2835_register_clock(struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman, init.flags |= CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE; } + /* if the clock is running then enable HAND_OFF */ + if (cprman_read(cprman, data->ctl_reg) & CM_ENABLE) { + dev_info(cprman->dev, + "found enabled clock %s - enabling hand off\n", + data->name); + init.flags |= CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF; + } + clock = devm_kzalloc(cprman->dev, sizeof(*clock), GFP_KERNEL); if (!clock) return NULL; --