| Message ID | 1464802526-16372-5-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [160601 10:37]: > The clock is directly sourced from sys_clkin, and provides an external > output clock for (typically) TWL6040 chip. Can this patch be applied separately without issues? Tony
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap54xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap54xx-clocks.dtsi index 4899c23..a8153b4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap54xx-clocks.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap54xx-clocks.dtsi @@ -1388,3 +1388,13 @@ reg = <0x021c>; }; }; + +&scm_wkup_pad_conf_clocks { + fref_xtal_ck: fref_xtal_ck { + #clock-cells = <0>; + compatible = "ti,gate-clock"; + clocks = <&sys_clkin>; + ti,bit-shift = <28>; + reg = <0x14>; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c index 294bc03..20f6985 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap54xx_clks[] = { DT_CLK("4013a000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", "dss_syc_gfclk_div"), DT_CLK("4013c000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", "dss_syc_gfclk_div"), DT_CLK("4013e000.timer", "timer_sys_ck", "dss_syc_gfclk_div"), + DT_CLK(NULL, "fref_xtal_ck", "fref_xtal_ck"), { .node_name = NULL }, };
The clock is directly sourced from sys_clkin, and provides an external output clock for (typically) TWL6040 chip. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap54xx-clocks.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)