@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
+static int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
{
/* Fail early if we don't have CPU_OFF support */
if (!psci_ops.cpu_off)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
+static void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN <<
PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT;
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
panic("psci: cpu %d failed to shutdown\n", cpu);
}
-int psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
+static int psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err, i;
There are three functions that do not get exported from the psci_smp.c file that if we make static then the following warnings get squashed: arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:74:6: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:86:5: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_kill' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> --- Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> --- arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)