From patchwork Mon Jun 27 09:54:12 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Yisen.Zhuang(Zhuangyuzeng)" X-Patchwork-Id: 9200173 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AF6075F for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA112284D4 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id DAFDE2856B; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:39:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A10F284D4 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bHSzK-0006cb-I8; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:37:54 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bHSyT-0005ew-LF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:37:05 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.60 (EHLO szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.60]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DMW03850; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:35:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.212.75) by szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:35:38 +0800 From: Yisen Zhuang To: , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: hns: normalize two different loop Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:54:12 +0800 Message-ID: <1467021255-95900-7-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1467021255-95900-1-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> References: <1467021255-95900-1-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.212.75] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5770F37E.0030, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ff9ad8146ec8ffb7daf91a8f7377a85c X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160627_023702_159967_6C62E055 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ivecera@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, fengguang.wu@intel.com, liguozhu@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de, charles.chenxin@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, geliangtang@163.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Daode Huang There are two approaches to assign data, one does 2 loops, another does 1 loop. This patch normalize the different methods to 1 loop. Signed-off-by: Daode Huang --- drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c index e36ee22..86ce28a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_main.c @@ -2567,15 +2567,15 @@ static char *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats_strings(char *data, int node, buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; if (node < DSAF_SERVICE_NW_NUM && !is_ver1) { for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { - snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, - "inod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); - buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; - } - for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { - snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, - "onod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); + snprintf(buff + 0 * ETH_GSTRING_LEN * DSAF_PRIO_NR, + ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "inod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", + node, i); + snprintf(buff + 1 * ETH_GSTRING_LEN * DSAF_PRIO_NR, + ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "onod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", + node, i); buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; } + buff += 1 * DSAF_PRIO_NR * ETH_GSTRING_LEN; } snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "onnod%d_tx_pkts", node); buff += ETH_GSTRING_LEN; @@ -2606,8 +2606,8 @@ static u64 *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats(struct dsaf_device *ddev, u64 *data, p[12] = hw_stats->stp_drop; if (node_num < DSAF_SERVICE_NW_NUM && !is_ver1) { for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { - p[13 + i] = hw_stats->rx_pfc[i]; - p[13 + i + DSAF_PRIO_NR] = hw_stats->tx_pfc[i]; + p[13 + i + 0 * DSAF_PRIO_NR] = hw_stats->rx_pfc[i]; + p[13 + i + 1 * DSAF_PRIO_NR] = hw_stats->tx_pfc[i]; } p[29] = hw_stats->tx_pkts; return &p[30];