From patchwork Tue Sep 6 17:25:15 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Marc Zyngier X-Patchwork-Id: 9317731 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC47B607D3 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D683F28DA1 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C91DA28E29; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 527A828DA1 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bhK8K-0002Ey-8s; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:26:04 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bhK8B-0001yn-BQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:25:57 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AB1BD7; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from approximate.cambridge.arm.com (approximate.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.207.16]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D193F211; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Always consider IRQ0 as an error Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:25:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1473182715-18953-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160906_102555_637344_DB483A3B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Will Deacon MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP As declared by the chief penguin, and enforced by the NO_IRQ brigade, IRQ0 doesn't exist, and is considered as an error (no irq). Unfortunately, the arm_pmu driver still considers it as valid in a large number of cases. Let's fix this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c index f5e1008..2c2754a 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus()); irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0); - if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { + if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus, cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1); free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu); @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs)) continue; irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i); - if (irq >= 0) + if (irq > 0) free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu)); } } @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler) } irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0); - if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { + if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu", &hw_events->percpu_pmu); if (err) { @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu) /* Check the IRQ type and prohibit a mix of PPIs and SPIs */ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); - if (irq >= 0) { + if (irq > 0) { bool spi = !irq_is_percpu(irq); if (i > 0 && spi != using_spi) { @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu) if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0) { int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); - if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { + if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) { /* If using PPIs, check the affinity of the partition */ int ret;