Message ID | 1479807866-6957-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Am Dienstag, 22. November 2016, 10:44:22 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > > The "arm,no-tick-in-suspend" property was introduced to note > implementations where the system counter does not quite follow the ARM > specification that it "must be implemented in an always-on power > domain". > > Particularly, RK3399's counter stops ticking when we switch from the > 24MHz clock to the 32KHz clock in low-power suspend, so let's mark it as > such. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> not sure if needed, but anyway Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index b65c193..d85b651 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ > <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, > <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, > <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>; > + arm,no-tick-in-suspend; > }; > > xin24m: xin24m {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index b65c193..d85b651 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>, <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW 0>; + arm,no-tick-in-suspend; }; xin24m: xin24m {