diff mbox series

arm64: mm: Drop the unused cpu parameter

Message ID 1538815744-27408-1-git-send-email-zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series arm64: mm: Drop the unused cpu parameter | expand

Commit Message

Shaokun Zhang Oct. 6, 2018, 8:49 a.m. UTC
Cpu parameter is never used in flush_context, remove it.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Will Deacon Oct. 9, 2018, 11:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:49:04PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> Cpu parameter is never used in flush_context, remove it.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Curious, but does this actually result in better code generation, or does
GCC already figure out that the parameter is unused?

Will
Shaokun Zhang Oct. 9, 2018, 1:53 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Will,

On 2018/10/9 19:57, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:49:04PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>> Cpu parameter is never used in flush_context, remove it.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 
> Curious, but does this actually result in better code generation, or does
> GCC already figure out that the parameter is unused?
> 

No hint from GCC compiler, the unused parameter is found when debug one
context switch issue and analyze the code. It is redundant and harmless
to remove it, a trivial patch.

Thanks,
Shaokun

> Will
> 
> .
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
index c127f94..009a7b2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@  void verify_cpu_asid_bits(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static void flush_context(unsigned int cpu)
+static void flush_context(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	u64 asid;
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@  static bool check_update_reserved_asid(u64 asid, u64 newasid)
 	return hit;
 }
 
-static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
+static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	static u32 cur_idx = 1;
 	u64 asid = atomic64_read(&mm->context.id);
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@  static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
 	/* We're out of ASIDs, so increment the global generation count */
 	generation = atomic64_add_return_relaxed(ASID_FIRST_VERSION,
 						 &asid_generation);
-	flush_context(cpu);
+	flush_context();
 
 	/* We have more ASIDs than CPUs, so this will always succeed */
 	asid = find_next_zero_bit(asid_map, NUM_USER_ASIDS, 1);
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@  void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
 	/* Check that our ASID belongs to the current generation. */
 	asid = atomic64_read(&mm->context.id);
 	if ((asid ^ atomic64_read(&asid_generation)) >> asid_bits) {
-		asid = new_context(mm, cpu);
+		asid = new_context(mm);
 		atomic64_set(&mm->context.id, asid);
 	}