diff mbox series

ARM: dts: s5pv210: Fix onenand's unit address format warning

Message ID 1547041383-16924-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined, archived
Commit be6a95a55a095686455307d9437a9a25cf0233ef
Headers show
Series ARM: dts: s5pv210: Fix onenand's unit address format warning | expand

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Jan. 9, 2019, 1:43 p.m. UTC
According to Devicetree specification, the unit-address must match the
first address specified in the reg property of the node.  Fix the DTC
warning onenand node:

    arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:81.29-93.5:
        Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/onenand@b0000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "b0600000"

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

---

The remaining warning is wrong clock-controller subnode of fimc camera.
    arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:578.32-580.6: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/camera/clock-controller: missing or empty reg/ranges property
The subnode in my understanding does not follow bindings and the driver.
The driver with current s5pv210.dtsi will not register a clock provider... but
I do not have a device to confirm this.
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Paweł Chmiel Jan. 9, 2019, 2:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Dnia środa, 9 stycznia 2019 14:43:03 CET Krzysztof Kozlowski pisze:
> According to Devicetree specification, the unit-address must match the
> first address specified in the reg property of the node.  Fix the DTC
> warning onenand node:
> 
>     arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:81.29-93.5:
>         Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/onenand@b0000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "b0600000"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> The remaining warning is wrong clock-controller subnode of fimc camera.
>     arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:578.32-580.6: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/camera/clock-controller: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> The subnode in my understanding does not follow bindings and the driver.
> The driver with current s5pv210.dtsi will not register a clock provider... but
> I do not have a device to confirm this.
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> index cc22c9db80d2..26ea5c66d8ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> -		onenand: onenand@b0000000 {
> +		onenand: onenand@b0600000 {
>  			compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-onenand";
>  			reg = <0xb0600000 0x2000>,
>  				<0xb0000000 0x20000>,
> 
Checked on Samsung Galaxy S (with local, not yet submited patches for devicetree support for onenand, which is missing in mainline) and it looks ok (device probed, was able to use ubi tools).
Tested-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
index cc22c9db80d2..26ea5c66d8ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ 
 			};
 		};
 
-		onenand: onenand@b0000000 {
+		onenand: onenand@b0600000 {
 			compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-onenand";
 			reg = <0xb0600000 0x2000>,
 				<0xb0000000 0x20000>,