From patchwork Thu Apr 18 16:07:04 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dave Martin X-Patchwork-Id: 10907625 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B602F13B5 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E3028B56 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8AB8728CAC; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB47328B56 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NMtdh/0wJK80Lg0xn9Q5kh1SL0TTydq8ze7CvNhH9Vc=; b=fUBZEoBIfVKb8JNTkUopJTNnBb zcsO7mslQDMno0XVxJSkCMn4YvWq7V1ng61PHiFLYLnIxuZyN7BIuzc1lMGWoyLt5YWAIRULN12IM Wle77moxbzKR+bOSzocuQLufe0jeGWOVibJVKsMS1DkGgNK+yh+wxGXttp0RX4fPDHHamh+9QErLF ACOwIKf/WPAdAj09+RVKlv95Hrrz9gXvZ3vh1hVl0bmCnPhU2bTx0p6KCJ1Fm9ZLVo8ybu9XqjIyB pRrjb/p+4I9EyH4XRlF6NGtS4Qb9VmjwvfTMt6Td75yxEew9OAYJo7PUualrEnVWRBXAJlIO+5aeL VyxQrkeg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hH9bA-0007Z4-TU; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:16 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hH9aA-0006N0-Fo for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:08:20 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327791715; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1EDF83F5AF; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:08:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Martin To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [PATCH v2 07/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Make register ioctl access errors more consistent Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:07:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1555603631-8107-8-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1555603631-8107-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> References: <1555603631-8107-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190418_090814_909745_2ED129E3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Okamoto Takayuki , Christoffer Dall , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andrew Jones , Zhang Lei , Julien Grall , =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Currently, the way error codes are generated when processing the SVE register access ioctls in a bit haphazard. This patch refactors the code so that the behaviour is more consistent: now, -EINVAL should be returned only for unrecognised register IDs or when some other runtime error occurs. -ENOENT is returned for register IDs that are recognised, but whose corresponding register (or slice) does not exist for the vcpu. To this end, in {get,set}_sve_reg() we now delegate the vcpu_has_sve() check down into {get,set}_sve_vls() and sve_reg_to_region(). The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS special case is picked off first, then sve_reg_to_region() plays the role of exhaustively validating or rejecting the register ID and (where accepted) computing the applicable register region as before. sve_reg_to_region() is rearranged so that -ENOENT or -EPERM is not returned prematurely, before checking whether reg->id is in a recognised range. -EPERM is now only returned when an attempt is made to access an actually existing register slice on an unfinalized vcpu. Fixes: e1c9c98345b3 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface") Fixes: 9033bba4b535 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Add pseudo-register for the guest's vector lengths") Suggested-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Dave Martin Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones --- arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index f5ff7ae..e45a042 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c @@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) unsigned int max_vq, vq; u64 vqs[DIV_ROUND_UP(SVE_VQ_MAX - SVE_VQ_MIN + 1, 64)]; + if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) + return -ENOENT; + if (WARN_ON(!sve_vl_valid(vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl))) return -EINVAL; @@ -242,6 +245,9 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) unsigned int max_vq, vq; u64 vqs[DIV_ROUND_UP(SVE_VQ_MAX - SVE_VQ_MIN + 1, 64)]; + if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) + return -ENOENT; + if (kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) return -EPERM; /* too late! */ @@ -304,7 +310,10 @@ struct sve_state_reg_region { unsigned int upad; /* extra trailing padding in user memory */ }; -/* Get sanitised bounds for user/kernel SVE register copy */ +/* + * Validate SVE register ID and get sanitised bounds for user/kernel SVE + * register copy + */ static int sve_reg_to_region(struct sve_state_reg_region *region, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) @@ -335,25 +344,30 @@ static int sve_reg_to_region(struct sve_state_reg_region *region, /* Verify that we match the UAPI header: */ BUILD_BUG_ON(SVE_NUM_SLICES != KVM_ARM64_SVE_MAX_SLICES); - if ((reg->id & SVE_REG_SLICE_MASK) > 0) - return -ENOENT; - - vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl); - reg_num = (reg->id & SVE_REG_ID_MASK) >> SVE_REG_ID_SHIFT; if (reg->id >= zreg_id_min && reg->id <= zreg_id_max) { + if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) || (reg->id & SVE_REG_SLICE_MASK) > 0) + return -ENOENT; + + vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl); + reqoffset = SVE_SIG_ZREG_OFFSET(vq, reg_num) - SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET; reqlen = KVM_SVE_ZREG_SIZE; maxlen = SVE_SIG_ZREG_SIZE(vq); } else if (reg->id >= preg_id_min && reg->id <= preg_id_max) { + if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) || (reg->id & SVE_REG_SLICE_MASK) > 0) + return -ENOENT; + + vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl); + reqoffset = SVE_SIG_PREG_OFFSET(vq, reg_num) - SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET; reqlen = KVM_SVE_PREG_SIZE; maxlen = SVE_SIG_PREG_SIZE(vq); } else { - return -ENOENT; + return -EINVAL; } sve_state_size = vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu); @@ -369,24 +383,22 @@ static int sve_reg_to_region(struct sve_state_reg_region *region, static int get_sve_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { + int ret; struct sve_state_reg_region region; char __user *uptr = (char __user *)reg->addr; - if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) - return -ENOENT; - /* Handle the KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS pseudo-reg as a special case: */ if (reg->id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) return get_sve_vls(vcpu, reg); - /* Otherwise, reg is an architectural SVE register... */ + /* Try to interpret reg ID as an architectural SVE register... */ + ret = sve_reg_to_region(®ion, vcpu, reg); + if (ret) + return ret; if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) return -EPERM; - if (sve_reg_to_region(®ion, vcpu, reg)) - return -ENOENT; - if (copy_to_user(uptr, vcpu->arch.sve_state + region.koffset, region.klen) || clear_user(uptr + region.klen, region.upad)) @@ -397,24 +409,22 @@ static int get_sve_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) static int set_sve_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) { + int ret; struct sve_state_reg_region region; const char __user *uptr = (const char __user *)reg->addr; - if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) - return -ENOENT; - /* Handle the KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS pseudo-reg as a special case: */ if (reg->id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) return set_sve_vls(vcpu, reg); - /* Otherwise, reg is an architectural SVE register... */ + /* Try to interpret reg ID as an architectural SVE register... */ + ret = sve_reg_to_region(®ion, vcpu, reg); + if (ret) + return ret; if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) return -EPERM; - if (sve_reg_to_region(®ion, vcpu, reg)) - return -ENOENT; - if (copy_from_user(vcpu->arch.sve_state + region.koffset, uptr, region.klen)) return -EFAULT;