Message ID | 1567231103-13237-6-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=/bUN=W3=lists.infradead.org=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4F514DE for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB2F23697 for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="JQAykp1N" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1BB2F23697 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=eTgOV6/VH1pPb0GF0w5DdXQdYlgI4Z7Nkz59EcWnSYg=; b=JQAykp1NR0MCrD F9wh2+Z0BoiHiWLtLfrSPz5RIoPmBkz3IK+2AmMafZQC/rvktWlaIaMRL75ZG1y1xF5mf4y+BmgQr bsgdwy3InwqOKJU+PkJ6T66f998oHakyGLLNExngopsHSE0GxvGMxN7Am2Nm4V4vEMDSodrfRuJr3 zQvImnN/0yIb8ddu9QD+Ww5A07iyw3dhMoIfT3mnloYXrN7nb3tws69xXMFoY3ssILO2fzSb9nEA/ gVnoDNRHjouC9Neuu6FhWWaxOgoBDGsJIBDm7nC4dl9JMEXY+KxCD4XnpLz7clbl6UDX6ugeX+gIi VvEYEgzyrt3IKAEZiipg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i3wTZ-0007yX-QX; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:03:05 +0000 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i3wRV-0006Ww-Mb for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:00:59 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B8999A0606B4FD5A4803; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.212.75) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:35 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <rth@twiddle.net>, <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>, <mattst88@gmail.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <paulus@samba.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, <gor@linux.ibm.com>, <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@libc.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <paul.burton@mips.com>, <jhogan@kernel.org>, <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, <chenhc@lemote.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] s390: numa: check the node id consistently for s390 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:19 +0800 Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-6-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.212.75] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190830_230058_128402_04872007 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.99 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [45.249.212.35 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, len.brown@intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, cai@lca.pw, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
check the node id consistently across different arches
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h index cca406f..75340ca 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu) #define cpumask_of_node cpumask_of_node static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) { + if (node >= nr_node_ids) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node]) + return cpu_online_mask; + return &node_to_cpumask_map[node]; }
According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting of proximity domain is optional, as below: This optional object is used to describe proximity domain associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT). This patch checks node id with the below case before returning node_to_cpumask_map[node]: 1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask 2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask 3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask [1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> --- Note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so returning &node_to_cpumask_map[node] does not seem to be correct, if this is problem, maybe clean it up in another patch. --- arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)