Message ID | 1635925699-3414834-1-git-send-email-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm: mxsfb: Check NULL pointer | expand |
On 11/3/21 8:48 AM, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > As we see in the drm_connector_list_iter_next(), it could return > NULL. In order to avoid the use of the NULL pointer, it may be > better to check the return value. > > Fixes: c42001e ("drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge") > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c > index 6da9355..b875c11 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c > @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ static int mxsfb_attach_bridge(struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb) > */ > drm_connector_list_iter_begin(drm, &iter); > mxsfb->connector = drm_connector_list_iter_next(&iter); > + if (!mxsfb->connector) > + return 1; In which case does this happen failure happen ? What is the test case ?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c index 6da9355..b875c11 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ static int mxsfb_attach_bridge(struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb) */ drm_connector_list_iter_begin(drm, &iter); mxsfb->connector = drm_connector_list_iter_next(&iter); + if (!mxsfb->connector) + return 1; drm_connector_list_iter_end(&iter); return 0;
As we see in the drm_connector_list_iter_next(), it could return NULL. In order to avoid the use of the NULL pointer, it may be better to check the return value. Fixes: c42001e ("drm: mxsfb: Use drm_panel_bridge") Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> --- drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)