Message ID | 20110609204113.GE2857@acer (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:41 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:27:11PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> On Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:00 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: >>> >>> As the driver is now passing platform device to the DMA mapping functions, >>> we should give it valid DMA masks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi> >>> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> >> >> Since you made this patch the first in the series the commit message is not >> quite right. Other than that: >> >> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> > > Ah, right. I forgot to change the commit message. How about following? > > From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi> > Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ep93xx: set DMA masks for the ep93xx_eth > > Since the driver uses the DMA API, we should pass it valid DMA masks. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi> > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> I like that better. Thanks, Hartley
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c index 8207954..1d4b65f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c @@ -402,11 +402,15 @@ static struct resource ep93xx_eth_resource[] = { } }; +static u64 ep93xx_eth_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); + static struct platform_device ep93xx_eth_device = { .name = "ep93xx-eth", .id = -1, .dev = { - .platform_data = &ep93xx_eth_data, + .platform_data = &ep93xx_eth_data, + .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32), + .dma_mask = &ep93xx_eth_dma_mask, }, .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_eth_resource), .resource = ep93xx_eth_resource,