From patchwork Fri Aug 3 09:02:35 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 1270031 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562363FC33 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SxDma-0006P6-NR; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:02:56 +0000 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SxDmU-0006Nt-Lw for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:02:54 +0000 Received: from mudshark.cambridge.arm.com (mudshark.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.79.58]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id q7392ZOK018055; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:02:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:02:35 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Updated Cortex-M3 series Message-ID: <20120803090235.GA26925@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1341512035-8173-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20120803075807.GD2626@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120803075807.GD2626@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-6.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [217.140.96.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Catalin Marinas , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:58:07AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, Hi Uwe, > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:13:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > now that 3.5 is about to come I invested the time to update the > > beginning of the Cortex-M3 support. > > > > Over all I rebased to v3.5-rc5 and addressed the comments by Russell. > > > > It would be great to get these patches into next early after the merge > > window for 3.6 closes to get them into 3.7. But I won't argue if they > > made it into 3.6 ;-) > Now that v3.6-rc1 is out can these go into next for the next merge > window? Last time I looked at the code, patch 3/3 was adding some fairly noisy debug prints to various syscalls and pieces of signal handling. e.g.: Can we drop these bits please? Will diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sys_arm.c b/arch/arm/kernel/sys_arm.c index 76cbb05..ea207df 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sys_arm.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sys_arm.c @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ int kernel_execve(const char *filename, * We were successful. We won't be returning to our caller, but * instead to user space by manipulating the kernel stack. */ + pr_info("we were successful\n"); asm( "add r0, %0, %1\n\t" "mov r1, %2\n\t" "mov r2, %3\n\t"