| Message ID | 201209071221.56938.arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Arnd, On 09/07/2012 10:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg@snapgear.com wrote: >> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >> >> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >> >> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >> mach-types file with these in mainline: >> >> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > > Hi Greg, > > Both ks8695 patches look good to me, I think we can apply them to the > arm-soc tree right away. If you agree, I'd also like to apply the > patch below to list you as a contact for the platform. If you prefer, > we can also list it as Maintained. Patch looks good. I am fine with marking it is maintained as well. > Arnd > > 8<---- > ARM: ks8695: add maintainers entry > > Greg Ungerer has hardware for this platform and is testing it > regularly. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index fdc0119..f7b8d14 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -913,6 +913,12 @@ W: http://www.digriz.org.uk/ts78xx/kernel > S: Maintained > F: arch/arm/mach-orion5x/ts78xx-* > > +ARM/MICREL KS8695 ARCHITECTURE > +M: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > +L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > +F: arch/arm/mach-ks8695 > +S: Odd Fixes > + > ARM/MIOA701 MACHINE SUPPORT > M: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> > L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) Regards Greg
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 12:11:55AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > Arnd > > > >8<---- > >ARM: ks8695: add maintainers entry > > > >Greg Ungerer has hardware for this platform and is testing it > >regularly. > > > >Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Great, applied to next/maintainers. Greg, do you want to collect a repo that you send pull requests for, or just ack and send patches for us to apply? The former is preferred by us in case there's a significant patch volume, for lower traffic platforms we can apply patches from email though though. -Olof
Hi, On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg@snapgear.com wrote: >> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >> >> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >> >> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >> mach-types file with these in mainline: >> >> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Both patches applied to a ks8695/boards branch, part of next/boards in arm-soc. Greg, you should submit separate patch to add the machine types to Russell's patch tracker. We are of course looking forward to efforts to move these platforms to device tree, since we want to avoid adding non-dt boards from here on out. -Olof
Hi Olof, On 09/08/2012 07:56 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 12:11:55AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >>> Arnd >>> >>> 8<---- >>> ARM: ks8695: add maintainers entry >>> >>> Greg Ungerer has hardware for this platform and is testing it >>> regularly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> > > Great, applied to next/maintainers. > > Greg, do you want to collect a repo that you send pull requests for, > or just ack and send patches for us to apply? The former is preferred > by us in case there's a significant patch volume, for lower traffic > platforms we can apply patches from email though though. I'll create a new git repository on kernel.org along with my others there. Regards Greg
Hi Olof, On 09/08/2012 01:20 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg@snapgear.com wrote: >>> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >>> >>> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >>> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >>> >>> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >>> mach-types file with these in mainline: >>> >>> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >>> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >>> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >>> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >>> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > Both patches applied to a ks8695/boards branch, part of next/boards in arm-soc. > > Greg, you should submit separate patch to add the machine types to > Russell's patch tracker. Yep, I'll create some patches for those. > We are of course looking forward to efforts > to move these platforms to device tree, since we want to avoid adding > non-dt boards from here on out. Yes that would be nice. I am not sure when I will have some time to take that on. But hopefully sometime soon. Regards Greg
Hi Olof, On 08/09/12 13:20, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg@snapgear.com wrote: >>> From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >>> >>> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >>> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >>> >>> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >>> mach-types file with these in mainline: >>> >>> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >>> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >>> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >>> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >>> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > Both patches applied to a ks8695/boards branch, part of next/boards in arm-soc. > > Greg, you should submit separate patch to add the machine types to > Russell's patch tracker. I am looking for some guidance here. Russell nacked a separate patch that put the board ID's back in. Do you want to drop these patches and I roll new ones that include the mach-types update as well? Or perhaps do this all some other way? Regards Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323 Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index fdc0119..f7b8d14 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -913,6 +913,12 @@ W: http://www.digriz.org.uk/ts78xx/kernel S: Maintained F: arch/arm/mach-orion5x/ts78xx-* +ARM/MICREL KS8695 ARCHITECTURE +M: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> +L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) +F: arch/arm/mach-ks8695 +S: Odd Fixes + ARM/MIOA701 MACHINE SUPPORT M: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)