@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr {
*/
static int vq2txq(struct virtqueue *vq)
{
- return (virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq) - 1) / 2;
+ return (vq->index - 1) / 2;
}
static int txq2vq(int txq)
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int txq2vq(int txq)
static int vq2rxq(struct virtqueue *vq)
{
- return virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq) / 2;
+ return vq->index / 2;
}
static int rxq2vq(int rxq)
The tty tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git#tty-next)
contains a new driver (SystemBase Multi-2/PCI) that fails to build for
(at least) the powerpc architecture. I have applied a patch that
disables the driver (I made CONFIG_SB105X in
drivers/staging/sb105x/Kconfig depend on BROKEN).
The arm-soc tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git#for-next)
(which you will get in pieces) has a merge conflict against the omap_dss2
tree (git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git#for-next) that
requires the followin fix up patch:
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/dsp-omap.h>
-#include <plat/vram.h>
-
#include "common.h"
#include "omap-secure.h"
@@ -32,7 +30,6 @@ int __weak omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void)
void __init omap_reserve(void)
{
- omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock();
omap_dsp_reserve_sdram_memblock();
omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock();
omap_barrier_reserve_memblock();
Part of the arm-soc tree also requires the following fixup patch due to a
conflict with the powerpc tree (patch from N, Mugunthan V
<mugunthanvnm@ti.com>):
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static struct device_node * __init omap_get_timer_dt
(struct of_device_id *match, continue;
}
- prom_add_property(np, &device_disabled);
+ of_add_property(np, &device_disabled);
return np;
}