diff mbox

mmc: core: Fix power sequence ordering in mmc_power_up

Message ID 20170301085902.7388-1-romain.perier@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Romain Perier March 1, 2017, 8:59 a.m. UTC
Currently, mmc_power_up calls the pre_power_on callback, enables the
power supply of the mmc by calling mmc_set_ios() and then call
post_power_on. WiFi chipsets like the AP6335 require a specific power
sequence ordering before being used. You must enable the power supply
and wait until it reaches its minimum voltage, gate the clock and wait
at least two cycles and then assert the reset line.

This commit prevents regulators to be enabled in the middle of or after
the power sequencing. We this fix, mmc_set_ios is first call, the
underlying regulators are enabled, then pre_power_on and post_power_on
are called, so clock and reset line are enabled in the right order,
after the regulator.

Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Arend van Spriel March 1, 2017, 9:53 a.m. UTC | #1
On 1-3-2017 9:59, Romain Perier wrote:
> Currently, mmc_power_up calls the pre_power_on callback, enables the
> power supply of the mmc by calling mmc_set_ios() and then call
> post_power_on. WiFi chipsets like the AP6335 require a specific power
> sequence ordering before being used. You must enable the power supply
> and wait until it reaches its minimum voltage, gate the clock and wait
> at least two cycles and then assert the reset line.

Hi Romain,

You have to be more clear. What power supply, ie. vmmc or the supply for
the wifi chipset. Without knowing much of the details to me this sounds
like a new powerseq variant.

> This commit prevents regulators to be enabled in the middle of or after
> the power sequencing. We this fix, mmc_set_ios is first call, the
> underlying regulators are enabled, then pre_power_on and post_power_on
> are called, so clock and reset line are enabled in the right order,
> after the regulator.

It feels counter intuitive and maybe even wrong to change a setup
pattern like this. Can you be sure this will not cause any regressions?

Regards,
Arend

> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 1076b9d..36df24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -1798,8 +1798,6 @@ void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
>  	if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_ON)
>  		return;
>  
> -	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
> -
>  	host->ios.vdd = fls(ocr) - 1;
>  	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_UP;
>  	/* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
> @@ -1819,13 +1817,20 @@ void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
>  	 */
>  	mmc_delay(10);
>  
> -	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
> -
>  	host->ios.clock = host->f_init;
>  
>  	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_ON;
>  	mmc_set_ios(host);
>  
> +	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This delay should be sufficient to wait at least two cycles of clock
> +	 * gated by pre_power_on
> +	 */
> +	mmc_delay(1);
> +	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * This delay must be at least 74 clock sizes, or 1 ms, or the
>  	 * time required to reach a stable voltage.
>
Romain Perier March 1, 2017, 10 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,


Le 01/03/2017 à 10:53, Arend Van Spriel a écrit :
> On 1-3-2017 9:59, Romain Perier wrote:
>> Currently, mmc_power_up calls the pre_power_on callback, enables the
>> power supply of the mmc by calling mmc_set_ios() and then call
>> post_power_on. WiFi chipsets like the AP6335 require a specific power
>> sequence ordering before being used. You must enable the power supply
>> and wait until it reaches its minimum voltage, gate the clock and wait
>> at least two cycles and then assert the reset line.
> Hi Romain,
>
> You have to be more clear. What power supply, ie. vmmc or the supply for
> the wifi chipset. Without knowing much of the details to me this sounds
> like a new powerseq variant.

That's for vqmmc. vqmmc has to be power on, then the clock must be
enabled and then the reset line
must be toggled.

>
>> This commit prevents regulators to be enabled in the middle of or after
>> the power sequencing. We this fix, mmc_set_ios is first call, the
>> underlying regulators are enabled, then pre_power_on and post_power_on
>> are called, so clock and reset line are enabled in the right order,
>> after the regulator.
> It feels counter intuitive and maybe even wrong to change a setup
> pattern like this. Can you be sure this will not cause any regressions?

Well, I could keep the current pattern as it was currently working, and
propose another one for this case (as an RFC).

What do you think ?

Regards,
Romain

>
> Regards,
> Arend
>
>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 1076b9d..36df24f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -1798,8 +1798,6 @@ void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
>>  	if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_ON)
>>  		return;
>>  
>> -	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
>> -
>>  	host->ios.vdd = fls(ocr) - 1;
>>  	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_UP;
>>  	/* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
>> @@ -1819,13 +1817,20 @@ void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
>>  	 */
>>  	mmc_delay(10);
>>  
>> -	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
>> -
>>  	host->ios.clock = host->f_init;
>>  
>>  	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_ON;
>>  	mmc_set_ios(host);
>>  
>> +	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This delay should be sufficient to wait at least two cycles of clock
>> +	 * gated by pre_power_on
>> +	 */
>> +	mmc_delay(1);
>> +	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * This delay must be at least 74 clock sizes, or 1 ms, or the
>>  	 * time required to reach a stable voltage.
>>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 1076b9d..36df24f 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1798,8 +1798,6 @@  void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
 	if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_ON)
 		return;
 
-	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
-
 	host->ios.vdd = fls(ocr) - 1;
 	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_UP;
 	/* Set initial state and call mmc_set_ios */
@@ -1819,13 +1817,20 @@  void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr)
 	 */
 	mmc_delay(10);
 
-	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
-
 	host->ios.clock = host->f_init;
 
 	host->ios.power_mode = MMC_POWER_ON;
 	mmc_set_ios(host);
 
+	mmc_pwrseq_pre_power_on(host);
+
+	/*
+	 * This delay should be sufficient to wait at least two cycles of clock
+	 * gated by pre_power_on
+	 */
+	mmc_delay(1);
+	mmc_pwrseq_post_power_on(host);
+
 	/*
 	 * This delay must be at least 74 clock sizes, or 1 ms, or the
 	 * time required to reach a stable voltage.