| Message ID | 20170302121500.8121-3-carlo@caione.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:15:00PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote: > From: Carlo Caione <carlo@endlessm.com> > > The implementation details for SCPI seems to suggest that the sensor > readings must be reported by SCP using a well defined scale > (millidegree Celsius for temperature, millivolts for voltage, > milliamperes for current, microwatts for power and microjoules for > energy). > > This is also important for the interaction with other subsystems: for > example both the thermal sub-system and the hwmon sysfs interface expect > the temperature expressed in millidegree Celsius. > > Unfortunately since this behaviour is dependent on the firmware > implementation there are cases where the sensor readings are reported > using a different scale. For example in the Amlogic SoCs the > temperature is reported in degree and not millidegree Celsius. > > To take into account this discrepancy and fixup the values reported by > SCP a new DT property `scpi,sensors-scale' is introduced and used in > this patch by the scpi-hwmon driver to convert the sensor readings to > the expected scale. > > Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <carlo@endlessm.com> > --- > drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > index 094f948f99ff..64a51e06c8df 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include <linux/thermal.h> > > struct sensor_data { > + unsigned int scale; > struct scpi_sensor_info info; > struct device_attribute dev_attr_input; > struct device_attribute dev_attr_label; > @@ -44,6 +45,14 @@ struct scpi_sensors { > const struct attribute_group *groups[2]; > }; > > +static const unsigned int scpi_scale[] = { > + 1000, /* Temperature (millidegrees Celsius) */ > + 1000, /* Voltage (millivolts) */ > + 1000, /* Current (milliamperes) */ > + 1000000, /* Power (microwatts) */ > + 1000000, /* Energy (microjoules) */ > +}; > + > static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) > { > struct scpi_thermal_zone *zone = dev; > @@ -57,6 +66,11 @@ static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { > + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; > + do_div(value, sensor->scale); Pretty elegant, I like that solution. > + } > + > *temp = value; > return 0; > } > @@ -77,6 +91,11 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { > + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; > + do_div(value, sensor->scale); > + } > + > return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value); > } > > @@ -97,6 +116,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops scpi_sensor_ops = { > static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > u16 nr_sensors, i; > + u32 scale[] = { 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000000, 1000000 }; > int num_temp = 0, num_volt = 0, num_current = 0, num_power = 0; > int num_energy = 0; > struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops; > @@ -131,6 +151,9 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > scpi_sensors->scpi_ops = scpi_ops; > > + of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "scpi,sensors-scale", > + scale, ARRAY_SIZE(scale)); > + We'll need some validation here. Otherwise a provided scale of 0 would crash the system. Guenter > for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) { > struct sensor_data *sensor = &scpi_sensors->data[idx]; > > @@ -178,6 +201,8 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > continue; > } > > + sensor->scale = scale[sensor->info.class]; > + > sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.mode = S_IRUGO; > sensor->dev_attr_input.show = scpi_show_sensor; > sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.name = sensor->input; > -- > 2.12.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Carlo, Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org> writes: > From: Carlo Caione <carlo@endlessm.com> > > The implementation details for SCPI seems to suggest that the sensor > readings must be reported by SCP using a well defined scale > (millidegree Celsius for temperature, millivolts for voltage, > milliamperes for current, microwatts for power and microjoules for > energy). > > This is also important for the interaction with other subsystems: for > example both the thermal sub-system and the hwmon sysfs interface expect > the temperature expressed in millidegree Celsius. > > Unfortunately since this behaviour is dependent on the firmware > implementation there are cases where the sensor readings are reported > using a different scale. For example in the Amlogic SoCs the > temperature is reported in degree and not millidegree Celsius. > > To take into account this discrepancy and fixup the values reported by > SCP a new DT property `scpi,sensors-scale' is introduced and used in > this patch by the scpi-hwmon driver to convert the sensor readings to > the expected scale. > > Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <carlo@endlessm.com> > --- > drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > index 094f948f99ff..64a51e06c8df 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include <linux/thermal.h> > > struct sensor_data { > + unsigned int scale; > struct scpi_sensor_info info; > struct device_attribute dev_attr_input; > struct device_attribute dev_attr_label; > @@ -44,6 +45,14 @@ struct scpi_sensors { > const struct attribute_group *groups[2]; > }; > > +static const unsigned int scpi_scale[] = { Following the device tree property, please change the array to u32 as well. > + 1000, /* Temperature (millidegrees Celsius) */ > + 1000, /* Voltage (millivolts) */ > + 1000, /* Current (milliamperes) */ > + 1000000, /* Power (microwatts) */ > + 1000000, /* Energy (microjoules) */ > +}; > + Using the array initialiser notation, part of the comment could be moved to the element index. This'll also make the scale to sensor class association more explicit. static const u32 scpi_scale[] = { [TEMPERATURE] = 1000, /* (millidegrees Celsius) */ [VOLTAGE] = 1000, /* (millivolts) */ [CURRENT] = 1000, /* (milliamperes) */ [POWER] = 1000000, /* (microwatts) */ [ENERGY] = 1000000, /* (microjoules) */ }; > static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) > { > struct scpi_thermal_zone *zone = dev; > @@ -57,6 +66,11 @@ static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { > + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; > + do_div(value, sensor->scale); > + } > + > *temp = value; > return 0; > } > @@ -77,6 +91,11 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { > + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; > + do_div(value, sensor->scale); > + } > + > return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value); > } > You add the exact same code twice - a helper to avoid the duplication would be nice. Thanks, Punit > @@ -97,6 +116,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops scpi_sensor_ops = { > static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > u16 nr_sensors, i; > + u32 scale[] = { 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000000, 1000000 }; > int num_temp = 0, num_volt = 0, num_current = 0, num_power = 0; > int num_energy = 0; > struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops; > @@ -131,6 +151,9 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > scpi_sensors->scpi_ops = scpi_ops; > > + of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "scpi,sensors-scale", > + scale, ARRAY_SIZE(scale)); > + > for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) { > struct sensor_data *sensor = &scpi_sensors->data[idx]; > > @@ -178,6 +201,8 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > continue; > } > > + sensor->scale = scale[sensor->info.class]; > + > sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.mode = S_IRUGO; > sensor->dev_attr_input.show = scpi_show_sensor; > sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.name = sensor->input;
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c index 094f948f99ff..64a51e06c8df 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/thermal.h> struct sensor_data { + unsigned int scale; struct scpi_sensor_info info; struct device_attribute dev_attr_input; struct device_attribute dev_attr_label; @@ -44,6 +45,14 @@ struct scpi_sensors { const struct attribute_group *groups[2]; }; +static const unsigned int scpi_scale[] = { + 1000, /* Temperature (millidegrees Celsius) */ + 1000, /* Voltage (millivolts) */ + 1000, /* Current (milliamperes) */ + 1000000, /* Power (microwatts) */ + 1000000, /* Energy (microjoules) */ +}; + static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) { struct scpi_thermal_zone *zone = dev; @@ -57,6 +66,11 @@ static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp) if (ret) return ret; + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; + do_div(value, sensor->scale); + } + *temp = value; return 0; } @@ -77,6 +91,11 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) if (ret) return ret; + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) { + value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class]; + do_div(value, sensor->scale); + } + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value); } @@ -97,6 +116,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops scpi_sensor_ops = { static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { u16 nr_sensors, i; + u32 scale[] = { 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000000, 1000000 }; int num_temp = 0, num_volt = 0, num_current = 0, num_power = 0; int num_energy = 0; struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops; @@ -131,6 +151,9 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) scpi_sensors->scpi_ops = scpi_ops; + of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "scpi,sensors-scale", + scale, ARRAY_SIZE(scale)); + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) { struct sensor_data *sensor = &scpi_sensors->data[idx]; @@ -178,6 +201,8 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) continue; } + sensor->scale = scale[sensor->info.class]; + sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.mode = S_IRUGO; sensor->dev_attr_input.show = scpi_show_sensor; sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.name = sensor->input;