From patchwork Thu Jun 8 15:18:18 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Christoffer Dall X-Patchwork-Id: 9775769 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FA0601C3 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C968A262FF for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BCCFB28553; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [65.50.211.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547A0262FF for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:18:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jAmmGn7JigX9ArbhVwyOcdCr+1dZBlS6NWOg3rMBRa8=; b=F11LGciBmDztso OSbUwNAvYeZNomg3cfwv7F7DdlCWfHbj5kyH1WdeebFwto4agMZyWJ7P7KXdJOcTj5jzuGtlrt2nu /r1kotvVerIhfiDAEnMqGh8IWTejms1oFEO9OMn5q9IEsVVWG9Exrwca6kgw4NIgjJOlWhPd5+jqL OHt/5y2uhPLayqdZ9A7a2G1IHGJDon16DgLlgR6hVX7h/9gDz12KZ8PTxN1l12TvyYQYRFZkwOSRH bKXCDfsK7HVzWAxq5D9c+k/kMDdXf+4R6UYy4fYTYrB0zjNEbqpelyVKuJI5wp3HP/3SiSrM3KxVk RLdSxjnMkyN48YeUAmeg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dIzCz-0004vS-P7; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:18:49 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dIzCr-0004p7-M6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:18:48 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x70so79736690wme.0 for ; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HjHKHkciZZsIDSlR4yiACBr97zlt0ep3mSrQbqeiaoU=; b=WEmM1ks2emOzpzegtpLfgCTQCQhilYSGIoqFqtN0cvmdDknRmcdNe5TWBzixxgyw58 WcRrV+55CkM6zGu1JZecQCTDyGiVjsb5DdSEnkAXU5Dn7BjQG9fIUAJiOn5JTrgPeJok TAHGcvwEjBHdVZQpJWAk0NPI9r+CmwD7yrZUc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HjHKHkciZZsIDSlR4yiACBr97zlt0ep3mSrQbqeiaoU=; b=E207ggX+nqdJ4VRec7GHAp0meLMNQdwAF1H8sLM5Q2twqFWLOPd4B2uUiqQF7z63pY +wGQecksPdgJUsHgampBemsHii/YOW2ZwQv0G9vm2dZk2NlaA3ZUPXOaDhuge7J5hrFW 0rtXrZHcMaCLFnj3NIyPpva7S/yUkjRsBQo+z0r9Pb1GEnCTM9NKZk0L906a+nl9bXQd BSZMqk55rPFjXM69HbTvqXSveEPDvAYoCMAoHbgeCwdf0K797fc9BBDLy0AhTbXYWD7e 1700xhxXpjfjiYA2KyjKLPO2wfELTUq+6qtb+GfbBivImYyk02/YaQDoUTcEsXWthVWc jIEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDwzGbk04wp+dYszIM843rO2ZOLDSevPOOXY3RrYhK+0a9Zpmi8 deI6QjNbPrQUzbEx X-Received: by 10.80.155.26 with SMTP id o26mr11832075edi.102.1496935099625; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (xd93ddc2d.cust.hiper.dk. [217.61.220.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm2205087eda.39.2017.06.08.08.18.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:18:18 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: arm/arm64: Don't assume initialized vgic when setting PMU IRQ Message-ID: <20170608151818.GB6378@cbox> References: <20170608133446.3875-1-cdall@linaro.org> <20170608133446.3875-10-cdall@linaro.org> <87y3t2h7ja.fsf@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3t2h7ja.fsf@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20170608_081841_882693_8EF18EED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:35:05PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08 2017 at 3:34:46 pm BST, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > The PMU IRQ number is set through the VCPU device's KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR > > ioctl handler for the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ attribute, but there is no > > enforced or stated requirement that this must happen after initializing > > the VGIC. As a result, calling vgic_valid_spi() which relies on the > > nr_spis being set during the VGIC init can incorrectly fail. > > > > Introduce irq_is_spi, which determines if an IRQ number is within the > > SPI range without verifying it against the actual VGIC properties. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall > > --- > > include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 2 ++ > > virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h > > index 131668f..a2ae9d2 100644 > > --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h > > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h > > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ > > #define KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS (1020 - 32) > > > > #define irq_is_ppi(irq) ((irq) >= VGIC_NR_SGIS && (irq) < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) > > +#define irq_is_spi(irq) ((irq) >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS && \ > > + (irq) <= VGIC_MAX_SPI) > > > > enum vgic_type { > > VGIC_V2, /* Good ol' GICv2 */ > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c > > index 26a42a9..87cb325 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c > > @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > > return -EFAULT; > > > > /* The PMU overflow interrupt can be a PPI or a valid SPI. */ > > - if (!(irq_is_ppi(irq) || vgic_valid_spi(vcpu->kvm, irq))) > > + if (!(irq_is_ppi(irq) || irq_is_spi(irq))) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > if (!pmu_irq_is_valid(vcpu->kvm, irq)) > > Does it mean that we can now fail an injection if the SPI is out of the > range of configured SPIs? > > If that's the case, the WARN_ON() in kvm_pmu_update_state() is going to > fire badly, and that's going to be ugly. Should we add a check for this > case in kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init()? > Yes, we should. How about this fixup? If you're happy with that, I'll just squash that into the current patch before applying the series. Thanks, -Christoffer Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index 5dbaa2c7..fc8a723 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -458,10 +458,24 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) /* * A valid interrupt configuration for the PMU is either to have a * properly configured interrupt number and using an in-kernel - * irqchip, or to neither set an IRQ nor create an in-kernel irqchip. + * irqchip, or to not have an in-kernel GIC and not set an IRQ. */ - if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu) != irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) - return -EINVAL; + if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) { + int irq = vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num; + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * If we are using an in-kernel vgic, at this point we know + * the vgic will be initialized, so we can check the PMU irq + * number against the dimensions of the vgic and make sure + * it's valid. + */ + if (!irq_is_ppi(irq) && !vgic_valid_spi(vcpu->kvm, irq)) + return -EINVAL; + } else if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu)) { + return -EINVAL; + } kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu); vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true;