| Message ID | 20170911155529.62891-4-icenowy@aosc.io (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Icenowy, On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote: > The DE2 CCU on Allwinner H5 SoC has a slightly different behavior than > the one on H3, so the compatible string is not set in the common DTSI > file. > > Add the compatible string of H5 DE2 CCU in H5 DTSI file. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > index d9a720bff05d..e237c05cfdb4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-ccu"; > }; > > +&display_clocks { > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk"; > +}; > + This is what I get for reviewing before reading the full patch set. Shouldn't this be rolled into the previous patch? Thanks,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi index d9a720bff05d..e237c05cfdb4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-ccu"; }; +&display_clocks { + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk"; +}; + &mmc0 { compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mmc", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
The DE2 CCU on Allwinner H5 SoC has a slightly different behavior than the one on H3, so the compatible string is not set in the common DTSI file. Add the compatible string of H5 DE2 CCU in H5 DTSI file. Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)