@@ -238,11 +238,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar)
static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 esr = read_sysreg_el2(esr);
- u8 ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
+ u8 ec;
+ u64 esr;
u64 hpfar, far;
- vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = esr;
+ esr = vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2;
+ ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW)
return true;
@@ -335,6 +336,8 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
exit_code = __guest_enter(vcpu, host_ctxt);
/* And we're baaack! */
+ if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(exit_code) != ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ)
+ vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = read_sysreg_el2(esr);
/*
* We're using the raw exception code in order to only process
* the trap if no SError is pending. We will come back to the
When we exit a guest due to an SError the vcpu fault info isn't updated with the ESR. Today this is only done for traps. The v8.2 RAS Extensions define ISS values for SError. Update the vcpu's fault_info with the ESR on SError so that handle_exit() can determine if this was a RAS SError and decode its severity. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> --- Changes since v4: * Switched to Marc's exit_code != irq version (Christoffer gave Reviewed-by for v2, which I missed (sorry)) arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)