diff mbox

[v3,7/7] ARM: sun8i: smp: Remove the disabling of CPU0

Message ID 20180219081837.15482-8-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Mylène Josserand Feb. 19, 2018, 8:18 a.m. UTC
On sun8i-a63t, hotplug CPU for CPU0 is currently not working.
Remove the possibility to disable CPU0 only for sun8i-a83t.

Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard Feb. 19, 2018, 8:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:18:37AM +0100, Mylène Josserand wrote:
> On sun8i-a63t, hotplug CPU for CPU0 is currently not working.
> Remove the possibility to disable CPU0 only for sun8i-a83t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> index fec592bf68b4..69d5ae5b3d72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> @@ -661,8 +661,12 @@ static int sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_kill(unsigned int l_cpu)
>  	return !ret;
>  }
>  
> -static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int __unused)
> +static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> +	/* CPU0 hotplug handled only for sun9i */
> +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("allwinner,sun8i-a83t"))
> +		if (cpu == 0)
> +			return false;

This also means that you have a window in your patch sequence where
you can disable the CPU0 on the A83t. This patch should be earlier.

Maxime
Mylène Josserand Feb. 19, 2018, 10:50 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:54:08 +0100
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:18:37AM +0100, Mylène Josserand wrote:
> > On sun8i-a63t, hotplug CPU for CPU0 is currently not working.
> > Remove the possibility to disable CPU0 only for sun8i-a83t.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> > index fec592bf68b4..69d5ae5b3d72 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> > @@ -661,8 +661,12 @@ static int sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_kill(unsigned int l_cpu)
> >  	return !ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int __unused)
> > +static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> >  {
> > +	/* CPU0 hotplug handled only for sun9i */
> > +	if (of_machine_is_compatible("allwinner,sun8i-a83t"))
> > +		if (cpu == 0)
> > +			return false;  
> 
> This also means that you have a window in your patch sequence where
> you can disable the CPU0 on the A83t. This patch should be earlier.

It is true.
With your comment in my first patch, it will be done earlier.

Thanks,

Mylène
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
index fec592bf68b4..69d5ae5b3d72 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
@@ -661,8 +661,12 @@  static int sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_kill(unsigned int l_cpu)
 	return !ret;
 }
 
-static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int __unused)
+static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	/* CPU0 hotplug handled only for sun9i */
+	if (of_machine_is_compatible("allwinner,sun8i-a83t"))
+		if (cpu == 0)
+			return false;
 	return true;
 }
 #endif