From patchwork Tue Jun 4 13:15:00 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 10975093 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315A292A for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9420500 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0E79E285FD; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDE420500 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xjzMR1tsvJfMVKExzgQsP1O/Yo86xUkFH9dfnNJWb7Q=; b=J8/d5D9nrxhto8 kBRWC12qe784ow84UVkY0bdb+58YyKSz6XFXkuIxZP214YMaCJp0J4K6dVERDHVBvH7J73+PZP0MY ouLtsOkui/daPM4fzFFRxUSTEf/KREMVZBftcerqSlp50Nqr6E5WWjONe9gGdzaf5k4zKGyv5E6mF TCs62iQ6uOt4Fh1z33QIZa5Sn73SPj2OYCHAEX77FG2VSGyA6xBA67sIXLU6MaAdAs6gdhygYo7a3 TAo4YOGWGnaeCdTriZuLMA/GfTnbn5GC8buYnFfmn8mt8lSKVsMAoGB6PVCL7CbXb/bOtm6UlzWIB 7jblfgW8CjwYk3DjmT+A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY9Lb-0005UA-00; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:19:27 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY9KP-0003vJ-2n; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:18:57 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x54DI4oQ028116; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1559654284; bh=hKZXGYlFN1fONABLyDc+vJLlvFIrfsKSse6yqM2h9dA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=mjI62sqN49gPl6cFJoxDVZjHIy1szKlLsYrpK+qUK7OsUlDcarolB+Y1l0glDzmkw rCcYm5koW4668+uWqe9Ruauc15dW3/xB4kVJrO0rwJ0KOTxrRTlWPPsqqv1K4gcAIw KkBadx9sQrcMDAkmjT1R1LMMePS9cWYIjYNLXewo= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x54DI3Y0043183 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:03 -0500 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:03 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:18:03 -0500 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x54DGdGU098972; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:17:57 -0500 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Tom Joseph , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Gustavo Pimentel Subject: [RFC PATCH 14/30] PCI: endpoint: Use notification chain mechanism to notify EPC events to EPF Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:45:00 +0530 Message-ID: <20190604131516.13596-15-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190604131516.13596-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20190604131516.13596-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190604_061814_127434_815613B2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Sekhar Nori , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Use atomic_notifier_call_chain to notify EPC events like linkup to EPF instead of using linkup ops in EPF driver. This is in preparation for adding proper locking mechanism to EPF ops. This will also enable to add more events (in addition to linkup) in the future. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori --- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 13 ++++++++--- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 9 ++------ drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 22 +------------------ include/linux/pci-epc.h | 8 +++++++ include/linux/pci-epf.h | 6 ++--- 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c index 27806987e93b..6380641ccc7a 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c @@ -360,12 +360,16 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work) msecs_to_jiffies(1)); } -static void pci_epf_test_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf) +static int pci_epf_test_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) { + struct pci_epf *epf = container_of(nb, struct pci_epf, nb); struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); queue_delayed_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler, msecs_to_jiffies(1)); + + return NOTIFY_OK; } static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf) @@ -541,8 +545,12 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) } } - if (!linkup_notifier) + if (linkup_notifier) { + epf->nb.notifier_call = pci_epf_test_notifier; + pci_epc_register_notifier(epc, &epf->nb); + } else { queue_work(kpcitest_workqueue, &epf_test->cmd_handler.work); + } return 0; } @@ -575,7 +583,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_probe(struct pci_epf *epf) static struct pci_epf_ops ops = { .unbind = pci_epf_test_unbind, .bind = pci_epf_test_bind, - .linkup = pci_epf_test_linkup, }; static struct pci_epf_driver test_driver = { diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c index e4712a0f249c..80831a874dbd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c @@ -538,16 +538,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_remove_epf); */ void pci_epc_linkup(struct pci_epc *epc) { - unsigned long flags; - struct pci_epf *epf; - if (!epc || IS_ERR(epc)) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags); - list_for_each_entry(epf, &epc->pci_epf, list) - pci_epf_linkup(epf); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags); + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&epc->notifier, 0, NULL); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_linkup); @@ -611,6 +605,7 @@ __pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct pci_epc_ops *ops, spin_lock_init(&epc->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epc->pci_epf); + ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&epc->notifier); device_initialize(&epc->dev); epc->dev.class = pci_epc_class; diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c index fb1306de8f40..93f28c65ace0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c @@ -20,26 +20,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_epf_mutex); static struct bus_type pci_epf_bus_type; static const struct device_type pci_epf_type; -/** - * pci_epf_linkup() - Notify the function driver that EPC device has - * established a connection with the Root Complex. - * @epf: the EPF device bound to the EPC device which has established - * the connection with the host - * - * Invoke to notify the function driver that EPC device has established - * a connection with the Root Complex. - */ -void pci_epf_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf) -{ - if (!epf->driver) { - dev_WARN(&epf->dev, "epf device not bound to driver\n"); - return; - } - - epf->driver->ops->linkup(epf); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_linkup); - /** * pci_epf_unbind() - Notify the function driver that the binding between the * EPF device and EPC device has been lost @@ -214,7 +194,7 @@ int __pci_epf_register_driver(struct pci_epf_driver *driver, if (!driver->ops) return -EINVAL; - if (!driver->ops->bind || !driver->ops->unbind || !driver->ops->linkup) + if (!driver->ops->bind || !driver->ops->unbind) return -EINVAL; driver->driver.bus = &pci_epf_bus_type; diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h index f641badc2c61..834dfc00aa00 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct pci_epc_mem { * @max_functions: max number of functions that can be configured in this EPC * @group: configfs group representing the PCI EPC device * @lock: spinlock to protect pci_epc ops + * @notifier: used to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epc { struct device dev; @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ struct pci_epc { struct config_group *group; /* spinlock to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */ spinlock_t lock; + struct atomic_notifier_head notifier; }; /** @@ -141,6 +143,12 @@ static inline void *epc_get_drvdata(struct pci_epc *epc) return dev_get_drvdata(&epc->dev); } +static inline int +pci_epc_register_notifier(struct pci_epc *epc, struct notifier_block *nb) +{ + return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&epc->notifier, nb); +} + struct pci_epc * __devm_pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct pci_epc_ops *ops, struct module *owner); diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epf.h b/include/linux/pci-epf.h index 2d6f07556682..4993f7f6439b 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-epf.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-epf.h @@ -55,13 +55,10 @@ struct pci_epf_header { * @bind: ops to perform when a EPC device has been bound to EPF device * @unbind: ops to perform when a binding has been lost between a EPC device * and EPF device - * @linkup: ops to perform when the EPC device has established a connection with - * a host system */ struct pci_epf_ops { int (*bind)(struct pci_epf *epf); void (*unbind)(struct pci_epf *epf); - void (*linkup)(struct pci_epf *epf); }; /** @@ -112,6 +109,7 @@ struct pci_epf_bar { * @epc: the EPC device to which this EPF device is bound * @driver: the EPF driver to which this EPF device is bound * @list: to add pci_epf as a list of PCI endpoint functions to pci_epc + * @nb: notifier block to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup) */ struct pci_epf { struct device dev; @@ -125,6 +123,7 @@ struct pci_epf { struct pci_epc *epc; struct pci_epf_driver *driver; struct list_head list; + struct notifier_block nb; }; #define to_pci_epf(epf_dev) container_of((epf_dev), struct pci_epf, dev) @@ -154,5 +153,4 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar, void pci_epf_free_space(struct pci_epf *epf, void *addr, enum pci_barno bar); int pci_epf_bind(struct pci_epf *epf); void pci_epf_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf); -void pci_epf_linkup(struct pci_epf *epf); #endif /* __LINUX_PCI_EPF_H */