| Message ID | 20190728235138.GA23429@embeddedor (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | 8eb9a2dff019055e4ff307bb7f8c64a7a20e79c8 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | i2c: s3c2410: Mark expected switch fall-through | expand |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 06:51:38PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch fixes the following warning: > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c: In function 'i2c_s3c_irq_nextbyte': > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:431:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > if (i2c->state == STATE_READ) > ^ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:439:2: note: here > case STATE_WRITE: > ^~~~ > > Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is > modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> -Kees > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c > index d97fb857b0ea..c98ef4c4a0c9 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c > @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int i2c_s3c_irq_nextbyte(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c, unsigned long iicstat) > * fall through to the write state, as we will need to > * send a byte as well > */ > + /* Fall through */ > > case STATE_WRITE: > /* > -- > 2.22.0 >
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 06:51:38PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch fixes the following warning: > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c: In function 'i2c_s3c_irq_nextbyte': > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:431:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > if (i2c->state == STATE_READ) > ^ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:439:2: note: here > case STATE_WRITE: > ^~~~ > > Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is > modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Applied to for-current, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c index d97fb857b0ea..c98ef4c4a0c9 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int i2c_s3c_irq_nextbyte(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c, unsigned long iicstat) * fall through to the write state, as we will need to * send a byte as well */ + /* Fall through */ case STATE_WRITE: /*
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c: In function 'i2c_s3c_irq_nextbyte': drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:431:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (i2c->state == STATE_READ) ^ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c:439:2: note: here case STATE_WRITE: ^~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)