| Message ID | 20190902112932.36129-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support | expand |
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with > an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. > Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > --- > v3 --> v4 > - fix commit > - missing include > - using new get_starting_head() helper > - added test description > --- > .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited > + * > + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD > + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test > + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. > + */ > + > +#include <signal.h> > +#include <ucontext.h> > + > +#include "test_signals_utils.h" > +#include "testcases.h" > + > +struct fake_sigframe sf; > + > +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, > + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) > +{ > + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; > + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; > + > + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ > + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) > + return 1; > + > + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); > + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going o append, i.e.: need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. > + > + head = get_starting_head(shead, need_sz, resv_sz, NULL); > + if (head) { > + /* Add a spurios fpsimd_context */ > + head->magic = FPSIMD_MAGIC; > + head->size = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); > + /* and terminate */ > + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head)); > + > + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); > + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); > + } > + > + return 1; [...] Cheers ---Dave
Hi On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with >> an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. >> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> --- >> v3 --> v4 >> - fix commit >> - missing include >> - using new get_starting_head() helper >> - added test description >> --- >> .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited >> + * >> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD >> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test >> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <signal.h> >> +#include <ucontext.h> >> + >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >> +#include "testcases.h" >> + >> +struct fake_sigframe sf; >> + >> +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, >> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) >> +{ >> + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; >> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; >> + >> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ >> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) >> + return 1; >> + >> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); >> + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); > > Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going > o append, i.e.: > > need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ Ok > > Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial > frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we > wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that > case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. > Any context grabbed by get_current_context() is verified at first to be sane when is copied in the handler by ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT() > } else if (signum == sig_copyctx && current->live_uc) { > memcpy(current->live_uc, uc, current->live_sz); > ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(current->live_uc); > current->live_uc_valid = 1; A missing fpsimd in the original sigframe would lead to an abort() straight away while preparing the test, and the test will fail. Cheers Cristian >> + >> + head = get_starting_head(shead, need_sz, resv_sz, NULL); >> + if (head) { >> + /* Add a spurios fpsimd_context */ >> + head->magic = FPSIMD_MAGIC; >> + head->size = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); >> + /* and terminate */ >> + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head)); >> + >> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); >> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); >> + } >> + >> + return 1; > > [...] > > Cheers > ---Dave >
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:15:58PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Hi > > On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > >> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with > >> an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. > >> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > >> --- > >> v3 --> v4 > >> - fix commit > >> - missing include > >> - using new get_starting_head() helper > >> - added test description > >> --- > >> .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >> > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited > >> + * > >> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD > >> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test > >> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#include <signal.h> > >> +#include <ucontext.h> > >> + > >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" > >> +#include "testcases.h" > >> + > >> +struct fake_sigframe sf; > >> + > >> +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, > >> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) > >> +{ > >> + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; > >> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; > >> + > >> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ > >> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) > >> + return 1; > >> + > >> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); > >> + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); > > > > Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going > > o append, i.e.: > > > > need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ > > Ok > > > > > Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial > > frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we > > wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that > > case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. > > > > Any context grabbed by get_current_context() is verified at first to be sane > when is copied in the handler by ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT() > > > } else if (signum == sig_copyctx && current->live_uc) { > > memcpy(current->live_uc, uc, current->live_sz); > > ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(current->live_uc); > > current->live_uc_valid = 1; > > A missing fpsimd in the original sigframe would lead to an abort() > straight away while preparing the test, and the test will fail. OK, but there is no abort() in ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(), only assert(0). Can you add an abort() after the assert() in there in patch 2? People probably aren't going to be building the tests with -DNDEBUG, but we should avoid unnecessary surprises... Cheers ---Dave
On 05/09/2019 13:39, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:15:58PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Hi >> >> On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >>>> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with >>>> an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. >>>> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >>>> --- >>>> v3 --> v4 >>>> - fix commit >>>> - missing include >>>> - using new get_starting_head() helper >>>> - added test description >>>> --- >>>> .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited >>>> + * >>>> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD >>>> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test >>>> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. >>>> + */ >>>> + >>>> +#include <signal.h> >>>> +#include <ucontext.h> >>>> + >>>> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >>>> +#include "testcases.h" >>>> + >>>> +struct fake_sigframe sf; >>>> + >>>> +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, >>>> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) >>>> +{ >>>> + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; >>>> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; >>>> + >>>> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ >>>> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) >>>> + return 1; >>>> + >>>> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); >>>> + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); >>> >>> Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going >>> o append, i.e.: >>> >>> need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ >> >> Ok >> >>> >>> Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial >>> frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we >>> wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that >>> case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. >>> >> >> Any context grabbed by get_current_context() is verified at first to be sane >> when is copied in the handler by ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT() >> >>> } else if (signum == sig_copyctx && current->live_uc) { >>> memcpy(current->live_uc, uc, current->live_sz); >>> ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(current->live_uc); >>> current->live_uc_valid = 1; >> >> A missing fpsimd in the original sigframe would lead to an abort() >> straight away while preparing the test, and the test will fail. > > OK, but there is no abort() in ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(), only assert(0). > Can you add an abort() after the assert() in there in patch 2? > Ok yes, I meant the abort coming from assert(0) in fact....I'll review all the critical asserts for additional aborts in V6 > People probably aren't going to be building the tests with -DNDEBUG, but > we should avoid unnecessary surprises... > > Cheers > ---Dave >
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 02:32:09PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On 05/09/2019 13:39, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:15:58PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > >>>> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with > >>>> an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. > >>>> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> v3 --> v4 > >>>> - fix commit > >>>> - missing include > >>>> - using new get_starting_head() helper > >>>> - added test description > >>>> --- > >>>> .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited > >>>> + * > >>>> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD > >>>> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test > >>>> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <signal.h> > >>>> +#include <ucontext.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" > >>>> +#include "testcases.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +struct fake_sigframe sf; > >>>> + > >>>> +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, > >>>> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; > >>>> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ > >>>> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) > >>>> + return 1; > >>>> + > >>>> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); > >>>> + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); > >>> > >>> Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going > >>> o append, i.e.: > >>> > >>> need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ > >> > >> Ok > >> > >>> > >>> Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial > >>> frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we > >>> wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that > >>> case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. > >>> > >> > >> Any context grabbed by get_current_context() is verified at first to be sane > >> when is copied in the handler by ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT() > >> > >>> } else if (signum == sig_copyctx && current->live_uc) { > >>> memcpy(current->live_uc, uc, current->live_sz); > >>> ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(current->live_uc); > >>> current->live_uc_valid = 1; > >> > >> A missing fpsimd in the original sigframe would lead to an abort() > >> straight away while preparing the test, and the test will fail. > > > > OK, but there is no abort() in ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(), only assert(0). > > Can you add an abort() after the assert() in there in patch 2? > > > Ok yes, I meant the abort coming from assert(0) in fact....I'll review all > the critical asserts for additional aborts in V6 OK -- I guess this only matters for things that should be reported as test failures. Things that are purely bugs in the test are less of a concern. Cheers ---Dave
On 04/09/2019 12:49, Dave Martin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 12:29:30pm +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with >> an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. >> Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> >> --- >> v3 --> v4 >> - fix commit >> - missing include >> - using new get_starting_head() helper >> - added test description >> --- >> .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited >> + * >> + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD >> + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test >> + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <signal.h> >> +#include <ucontext.h> >> + >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >> +#include "testcases.h" >> + >> +struct fake_sigframe sf; >> + >> +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, >> + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) >> +{ >> + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; >> + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; >> + >> + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ >> + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) >> + return 1; >> + >> + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); >> + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); > > Nit: Maybe write this sum in the same order as the records we're going > o append, i.e.: > > need_sz = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context) + HDR_SZ; /* for terminator */ > Ok > Also, maybe fail this test if there is no fpsimd_context in the initial > frame from get_current_context(): that would be a kernel bug, but we > wouldn't be giving fake_sigreturn() duplicate fpsimd_contexts in that > case -- so this test wouldn't test the thing it's supposed to test. > I've reviewed ASSERT_BAD/GOOD_CONTEXT() macros in this series to use abort() instead of assert(): this means any frame get with get_current_context() will be checked to be GOOD before the test starts. >> + >> + head = get_starting_head(shead, need_sz, resv_sz, NULL); >> + if (head) { >> + /* Add a spurios fpsimd_context */ >> + head->magic = FPSIMD_MAGIC; >> + head->size = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); >> + /* and terminate */ >> + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head)); >> + >> + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); >> + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); >> + } >> + >> + return 1; > Here I'll avoid the timeout on !head and exit straight away (like in other fake_ tests) > [...] > > Cheers > ---Dave > Cheers Cristian
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c7122c44f53f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited + * + * Place a fake sigframe on the stack including an additional FPSIMD + * record: on sigreturn Kernel must spot this attempt and the test + * case is expected to be terminated via SEGV. + */ + +#include <signal.h> +#include <ucontext.h> + +#include "test_signals_utils.h" +#include "testcases.h" + +struct fake_sigframe sf; + +static int fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run(struct tdescr *td, + siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) +{ + size_t resv_sz, need_sz; + struct _aarch64_ctx *shead = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf), *head; + + /* just to fill the ucontext_t with something real */ + if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc)) + return 1; + + resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf); + need_sz = HDR_SZ + sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); + + head = get_starting_head(shead, need_sz, resv_sz, NULL); + if (head) { + /* Add a spurios fpsimd_context */ + head->magic = FPSIMD_MAGIC; + head->size = sizeof(struct fpsimd_context); + /* and terminate */ + write_terminator_record(GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head)); + + ASSERT_BAD_CONTEXT(&sf.uc); + fake_sigreturn(&sf, sizeof(sf), 0); + } + + return 1; +} + +struct tdescr tde = { + .name = "FAKE_SIGRETURN_DUPLICATED_FPSIMD", + .descr = "Triggers a sigreturn including two fpsimd_context", + .sig_ok = SIGSEGV, + .timeout = 3, + .run = fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd_run, +};
Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with an anomalous additional fpsimd_context and place it onto the stack. Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- v3 --> v4 - fix commit - missing include - using new get_starting_head() helper - added test description --- .../fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd.c