From patchwork Wed Sep 18 13:19:14 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jia He X-Patchwork-Id: 11150371 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5245213BD for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB5D206C2 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ld8xCWok" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2FB5D206C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=dMZNXJ9tZt2SW1VqNv+XLQHkJT97unwg60YcBWf1LkI=; b=ld8xCWokPu9EDz1qD61nZXk3mE YALogA3R4Cp9jw8nvJdrDI9ORhc/gtDK0JqGa5gyznhK2NtJsME52OGa5PMfIIpupC3uC/4sJ/ldQ BLxlb6eg3AqbdoVi6RltLIeVgrovZTBI7PxZ9ePbqgMY5sifZHxfa7ZctuCSGyCYOViArHIFcpd9k Jh+ZstwZTBsnR2wz1tXPql9wfRTirVJYjFUSvgTpZqqRECQZvqabJaZbJaiRdmwjuoWOWUuG2RzQu tjeH51lNHE8WshLB+aeKuENAgvA/Y/2ythEtxlbn/mp2HqOZkN7dPGr872QN2KzFUL3XuYF/yRwt8 TeQEcEDg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iAZsi-0006hh-E1; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:20:28 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iAZs2-0004su-RN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:19:48 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E841576; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (entos-thunderx2-02.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.40.54]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DA9F83F575; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:19:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Jia He To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Marc Zyngier , Matthew Wilcox , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Suzuki Poulose Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] mm: fix double page fault on arm64 if PTE_AF is cleared Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:19:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20190918131914.38081-4-justin.he@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190918131914.38081-1-justin.he@arm.com> References: <20190918131914.38081-1-justin.he@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190918_061947_119875_B9F44A7E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.13 ) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (0.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ralph Campbell , Jia He , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Jun Yao , Kaly Xin , =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Punit Agrawal , hejianet@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , Robin Murphy , Alex Van Brunt MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST1 in arm64 guest, there will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page. Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose [ 110.016195] Call trace: [ 110.016826] do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690 [ 110.017812] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 [ 110.018726] el1_da+0x20/0xc4 [ 110.019492] __arch_copy_from_user+0x180/0x280 [ 110.020646] do_wp_page+0xb0/0x860 [ 110.021517] __handle_mm_fault+0x994/0x1338 [ 110.022606] handle_mm_fault+0xe8/0x180 [ 110.023584] do_page_fault+0x240/0x690 [ 110.024535] do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 [ 110.025423] el0_da+0x20/0x24 The pte info before __copy_from_user_inatomic is (PTE_AF is cleared): [ffff9b007000] pgd=000000023d4f8003, pud=000000023da9b003, pmd=000000023d4b3003, pte=360000298607bd3 As told by Catalin: "On arm64 without hardware Access Flag, copying from user will fail because the pte is old and cannot be marked young. So we always end up with zeroed page after fork() + CoW for pfn mappings. we don't always have a hardware-managed access flag on arm64." This patch fix it by calling pte_mkyoung. Also, the parameter is changed because vmf should be passed to cow_user_page() [1] https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/tree/master/src/test/vmmalloc_fork Reported-by: Yibo Cai Signed-off-by: Jia He --- mm/memory.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index e2bb51b6242e..d2c130a5883b 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -118,6 +118,13 @@ int randomize_va_space __read_mostly = 2; #endif +#ifndef arch_faults_on_old_pte +static inline bool arch_faults_on_old_pte(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + static int __init disable_randmaps(char *s) { randomize_va_space = 0; @@ -2140,8 +2147,12 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, return same; } -static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma) +static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, + struct vm_fault *vmf) { + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; + unsigned long addr = vmf->address; + debug_dma_assert_idle(src); /* @@ -2152,20 +2163,34 @@ static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned lo */ if (unlikely(!src)) { void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst); - void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)(va & PAGE_MASK); + void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)(addr & PAGE_MASK); + pte_t entry; /* * This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there * in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable, * in which case we just give up and fill the result with - * zeroes. + * zeroes. On architectures with software "accessed" bits, + * we would take a double page fault here, so mark it + * accessed here. */ + if (arch_faults_on_old_pte() && !pte_young(vmf->orig_pte)) { + spin_lock(vmf->ptl); + if (likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { + entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte); + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, + vmf->pte, entry, 0)) + update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, vmf->pte); + } + spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); + } + if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) clear_page(kaddr); kunmap_atomic(kaddr); flush_dcache_page(dst); } else - copy_user_highpage(dst, src, va, vma); + copy_user_highpage(dst, src, addr, vma); } static gfp_t __get_fault_gfp_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma) @@ -2318,7 +2343,7 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf) vmf->address); if (!new_page) goto oom; - cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf->address, vma); + cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, vmf); } if (mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL, &memcg, false))