From patchwork Tue Sep 24 02:18:45 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiaowei Bao X-Patchwork-Id: 11157867 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085861599 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 02:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA26A2064A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 02:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="m8w+7ja4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DA26A2064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=P19r7e5kFw5bGhgOqN49SBwQAaCjr7IPc4hExErrO7g=; b=m8w+7ja4xFPlY8SnkysKP+Fv3H faievMjPq8eaLsOs9DW1vl2wFjFU5jMo0ofDZpeD56Iz/2B+58OlogevrKL11k+31GVcuMsYx+lId tkZVrT/GVe0LYzzz2VflUwGx1bH4MSQVIPRHyutLduopqzv2OFpLNPGYoXM6Y/2aDy+pRs/Fxtyx0 +31XhftYhbQ9PDYFMeAEeWOW5sKH33lj+Qf1zNOy5AyvVpvOUc3+qhxWRm2YdGilh+QRzWw01pVJj 60pSUxukPChRAEt1n7kUcHTbGPPGsr/MvoCo4201utNci3lcgML1CovoF24zwwhNIrzyj9fTNTYEW zITjPaRg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iCabt-0005zt-6m; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 02:31:25 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com ([92.121.34.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iCaaJ-0002wB-KH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 02:29:49 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55678200386; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:29:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.14]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544F520037D; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:29:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from titan.ap.freescale.net (TITAN.ap.freescale.net [10.192.208.233]) by invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B9540323; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:29:24 +0800 (SGT) From: Xiaowei Bao To: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, kishon@ti.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, andrew.murray@arm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v4 07/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:18:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20190924021849.3185-8-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20190924021849.3185-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> References: <20190924021849.3185-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190923_192948_031259_59C82E03 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.04 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [92.121.34.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xiaowei Bao MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI capability, make it more flexible. Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao --- v2: - Remove the repeated assignment code. v3: - Use ep_func msi_cap and msix_cap to decide the msi_capable and msix_capable of pci_epc_features struct. v4: - No change. drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c index a9c552e..1e07287 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct ls_pcie_ep { struct dw_pcie *pci; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; }; #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) @@ -40,26 +41,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = { { }, }; -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = { - .linkup_notifier = false, - .msi_capable = true, - .msix_capable = false, - .bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), -}; - static const struct pci_epc_features* ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { - return &ls_pcie_epc_features; + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + + return pcie->ls_epc; } static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func; enum pci_barno bar; + ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, 0); + if (!ep_func) + return; + for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar); + + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep_func->msi_cap ? true : false; + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep_func->msix_cap ? true : false; } static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct dw_pcie *pci; struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; struct resource *dbi_base; int ret; @@ -130,6 +137,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!pci) return -ENOMEM; + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ls_epc) + return -ENOMEM; + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs"); pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base); if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) @@ -140,6 +151,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops; pcie->pci = pci; + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), + + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);