Message ID | 20191003114726.v2.1.Ib233b3e706cf6317858384264d5b0ed35657456e@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Commit | 287422a95fe28e05c1952de0472e0dfdffa6caae |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] drm/rockchip: Round up _before_ giving to the clock framework | expand |
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:47:30AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > I'm embarassed to say that even though I've touched > vop_crtc_mode_fixup() twice and I swear I tested it, there's still a > stupid glaring bug in it. Specifically, on veyron_minnie (with all > the latest display timings) we want to be setting our pixel clock to > 66,666,666.67 Hz and we tell userspace that's what we set, but we're > actually choosing 66,000,000 Hz. This is confirmed by looking at the > clock tree. > > The problem is that in drm_display_mode_from_videomode() we convert > from Hz to kHz with: > > dmode->clock = vm->pixelclock / 1000; > > ...and drm_display_mode_from_videomode() is called from panel-simple > when we have an "override_mode" like we do on veyron_minnie. See > commit 123643e5c40a ("ARM: dts: rockchip: Specify > rk3288-veyron-minnie's display timings"). > > ...so when the device tree specifies a clock of 66666667 for the panel > then DRM translates that to 66666000. The clock framework will always > pick a clock that is _lower_ than the one requested, so it will refuse > to pick 66666667 and we'll end up at 66000000. > > While we could try to fix drm_display_mode_from_videomode() to round > to the nearest kHz and it would fix our problem, it wouldn't help if > the clock we actually needed was 60,000,001 Hz. We could > alternatively have DRM always round up, but maybe this would break > someone else who already baked in the assumption that DRM rounds down. > Specifically note that clock drivers are not consistent about whether > they round up or round down when you call clk_set_rate(). We know how > Rockchip's clock driver works, but (for instance) you can see that on > most Qualcomm clocks the default is clk_rcg2_ops which rounds up. > > Let's solve this by just adding 999 Hz before calling > clk_round_rate(). This should be safe and work everywhere. As > discussed in more detail in comments in the commit, Rockchip's PLLs > are configured in a way that there shouldn't be another PLL setting > that is only a few kHz off so we won't get mixed up. > > NOTE: if this is picked to stable, it's probably easiest to first pick > commit 527e4ca3b6d1 ("drm/rockchip: Base adjustments of the mode based > on prev adjustments") which shouldn't hurt in stable. > > Fixes: b59b8de31497 ("drm/rockchip: return a true clock rate to adjusted_mode") > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Pushed to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch (and revision)! Sean > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Beefed up the commit message (Sean). > > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > index 613404f86668..84e3decb17b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c > @@ -1040,10 +1040,41 @@ static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) > { > struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc); > + unsigned long rate; > > - adjusted_mode->clock = > - DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, > - adjusted_mode->clock * 1000), 1000); > + /* > + * Clock craziness. > + * > + * Key points: > + * > + * - DRM works in in kHz. > + * - Clock framework works in Hz. > + * - Rockchip's clock driver picks the clock rate that is the > + * same _OR LOWER_ than the one requested. > + * > + * Action plan: > + * > + * 1. When DRM gives us a mode, we should add 999 Hz to it. That way > + * if the clock we need is 60000001 Hz (~60 MHz) and DRM tells us to > + * make 60000 kHz then the clock framework will actually give us > + * the right clock. > + * > + * NOTE: if the PLL (maybe through a divider) could actually make > + * a clock rate 999 Hz higher instead of the one we want then this > + * could be a problem. Unfortunately there's not much we can do > + * since it's baked into DRM to use kHz. It shouldn't matter in > + * practice since Rockchip PLLs are controlled by tables and > + * even if there is a divider in the middle I wouldn't expect PLL > + * rates in the table that are just a few kHz different. > + * > + * 2. Get the clock framework to round the rate for us to tell us > + * what it will actually make. > + * > + * 3. Store the rounded up rate so that we don't need to worry about > + * this in the actual clk_set_rate(). > + */ > + rate = clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, adjusted_mode->clock * 1000 + 999); > + adjusted_mode->clock = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, 1000); > > return true; > } > -- > 2.23.0.444.g18eeb5a265-goog > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c index 613404f86668..84e3decb17b1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c @@ -1040,10 +1040,41 @@ static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode) { struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc); + unsigned long rate; - adjusted_mode->clock = - DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, - adjusted_mode->clock * 1000), 1000); + /* + * Clock craziness. + * + * Key points: + * + * - DRM works in in kHz. + * - Clock framework works in Hz. + * - Rockchip's clock driver picks the clock rate that is the + * same _OR LOWER_ than the one requested. + * + * Action plan: + * + * 1. When DRM gives us a mode, we should add 999 Hz to it. That way + * if the clock we need is 60000001 Hz (~60 MHz) and DRM tells us to + * make 60000 kHz then the clock framework will actually give us + * the right clock. + * + * NOTE: if the PLL (maybe through a divider) could actually make + * a clock rate 999 Hz higher instead of the one we want then this + * could be a problem. Unfortunately there's not much we can do + * since it's baked into DRM to use kHz. It shouldn't matter in + * practice since Rockchip PLLs are controlled by tables and + * even if there is a divider in the middle I wouldn't expect PLL + * rates in the table that are just a few kHz different. + * + * 2. Get the clock framework to round the rate for us to tell us + * what it will actually make. + * + * 3. Store the rounded up rate so that we don't need to worry about + * this in the actual clk_set_rate(). + */ + rate = clk_round_rate(vop->dclk, adjusted_mode->clock * 1000 + 999); + adjusted_mode->clock = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, 1000); return true; }