diff mbox series

[07/11] ARM: OMAP2+: prm44xx: make prm_{save, restore}_context static

Message ID 20191008123453.1651-7-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [01/11] ARM: bcm2836: include local platsmp.h for bcm2836_smp_ops | expand

Commit Message

Ben Dooks Oct. 8, 2019, 12:34 p.m. UTC
The prm_{save,restore}_context functions are not exported
so make them static to avoid the following warnings:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c:748:6: warning: symbol 'prm_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c:759:6: warning: symbol 'prm_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
index 1d9346f2a4ae..25093c1e5b9a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@  struct pwrdm_ops omap4_pwrdm_operations = {
 
 static int omap44xx_prm_late_init(void);
 
-void prm_save_context(void)
+static void prm_save_context(void)
 {
 	omap_prm_context.irq_enable =
 			omap4_prm_read_inst_reg(AM43XX_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@  void prm_save_context(void)
 						omap4_prcm_irq_setup.pm_ctrl);
 }
 
-void prm_restore_context(void)
+static void prm_restore_context(void)
 {
 	omap4_prm_write_inst_reg(omap_prm_context.irq_enable,
 				 OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_INST,