From patchwork Tue Apr 14 03:03:47 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zenghui Yu X-Patchwork-Id: 11486595 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB256CA for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879C02072D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sBmzLCH1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 879C02072D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=g9WZ9W0d6zDG9W1wL7kq56o8b2jqlwDy5JeAxqaAHS8=; b=sBmzLCH1m1mg+G nkEXVvI6kssnsFiK8eTrnkuVBCQVukoPRgx2c9yyyzx3qNxkaZpplDI6fOl4TdtopO66nxInjBmK2 l7mmx40P5DKq1NJpknLJuiK+pplbro/6TpYzBO1V2WL5Mzp14Wf5i/UBJkZbcwSbMRwiDLN2NIBX9 6AwvJE2IstdvHyPbCBKcBJvzd1TCl1biB+mxR9oVww5o/5Ho8tXCPikpP7myQfcUUxLk1t6P2azq4 JWcQYE4LZ3GaZsBplUexm51nwS3W5V6eWWH4YbWX3fwRM7m8xU/RVUVxC+bsqntkUDfCCWndqkDWJ zs5cDxVyqJjRZ/9X5Skw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOBsO-0004Xr-To; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:04:40 +0000 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOBsA-0004OG-O3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:04:28 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3D6C6B928563B7540FB8; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:04:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-8RFUVS3.china.huawei.com (10.173.222.27) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:04:09 +0800 From: Zenghui Yu To: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Retire all pending LPIs on vcpu destroy Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:03:47 +0800 Message-ID: <20200414030349.625-2-yuzenghui@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200414030349.625-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> References: <20200414030349.625-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.173.222.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200413_200426_948865_C7B8054D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.07 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [45.249.212.191 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yezengruan@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Zenghui Yu , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org It's likely that the vcpu fails to handle all virtual interrupts if userspace decides to destroy it, leaving the pending ones stay in the ap_list. If the un-handled one is a LPI, its vgic_irq structure will be eventually leaked because of an extra refcount increment in vgic_queue_irq_unlock(). This was detected by kmemleak on almost every guest destroy, the backtrace is as follows: unreferenced object 0xffff80725aed5500 (size 128): comm "CPU 5/KVM", pid 40711, jiffies 4298024754 (age 166366.512s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 01 a9 73 6d 80 ff ff ...........sm... c8 61 ee a9 00 20 ff ff 28 1e 55 81 6c 80 ff ff .a... ..(.U.l... backtrace: [<000000004bcaa122>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2dc/0x418 [<0000000069c7dabb>] vgic_add_lpi+0x88/0x418 [<00000000bfefd5c5>] vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi+0x4dc/0x588 [<00000000cf993975>] vgic_its_process_commands.part.5+0x484/0x1198 [<000000004bd3f8e3>] vgic_its_process_commands+0x50/0x80 [<00000000b9a65b2b>] vgic_mmio_write_its_cwriter+0xac/0x108 [<0000000009641ebb>] dispatch_mmio_write+0xd0/0x188 [<000000008f79d288>] __kvm_io_bus_write+0x134/0x240 [<00000000882f39ac>] kvm_io_bus_write+0xe0/0x150 [<0000000078197602>] io_mem_abort+0x484/0x7b8 [<0000000060954e3c>] kvm_handle_guest_abort+0x4cc/0xa58 [<00000000e0d0cd65>] handle_exit+0x24c/0x770 [<00000000b44a7fad>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x460/0x1988 [<0000000025fb897c>] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x4f8/0xee0 [<000000003271e317>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x160/0xcd8 [<00000000e7f39607>] ksys_ioctl+0x98/0xd8 Fix it by retiring all pending LPIs in the ap_list on the destroy path. p.s. I can also reproduce it on a normal guest shutdown. It is because userspace still send LPIs to vcpu (through KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl) while the guest is being shutdown and unable to handle it. A little strange though and haven't dig further... Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c index a963b9d766b7..53ec9b9d9bc4 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c @@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu; + /* + * Retire all pending LPIs on this vcpu anyway as we're + * going to destroy it. + */ + vgic_flush_pending_lpis(vcpu); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_head); }