diff mbox series

[v2,1/3] arm64: entry: Refactor and modernise annotation for ret_to_user

Message ID 20200501115430.37315-2-broonie@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series arm64: Finish up assembler annotation modernisation | expand

Commit Message

Mark Brown May 1, 2020, 11:54 a.m. UTC
As part of an effort to clarify and clean up the assembler annotations
new macros have been introduced which annotate the start and end of blocks
of code in assembler files. Currently ret_to_user has an out of line slow
path work_pending placed above the main function which makes annotating the
start and end of these blocks of code awkward.

Since work_pending is only referenced from within ret_to_user try to make
things a bit clearer by moving it after the current ret_to_user and then
marking both ret_to_user and work_pending as part of a single ret_to_user
code block.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Rutland May 1, 2020, 12:33 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:54:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> As part of an effort to clarify and clean up the assembler annotations
> new macros have been introduced which annotate the start and end of blocks
> of code in assembler files. Currently ret_to_user has an out of line slow
> path work_pending placed above the main function which makes annotating the
> start and end of these blocks of code awkward.
> 
> Since work_pending is only referenced from within ret_to_user try to make
> things a bit clearer by moving it after the current ret_to_user and then
> marking both ret_to_user and work_pending as part of a single ret_to_user
> code block.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Makes sense to me, and the change looks sound, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index ddcde093c433..73e2c8f5b728 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -727,21 +727,10 @@ el0_error_naked:
>  	b	ret_to_user
>  SYM_CODE_END(el0_error)
>  
> -/*
> - * Ok, we need to do extra processing, enter the slow path.
> - */
> -work_pending:
> -	mov	x0, sp				// 'regs'
> -	bl	do_notify_resume
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> -	bl	trace_hardirqs_on		// enabled while in userspace
> -#endif
> -	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]	// re-check for single-step
> -	b	finish_ret_to_user
>  /*
>   * "slow" syscall return path.
>   */
> -ret_to_user:
> +SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(ret_to_user)
>  	disable_daif
>  	gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
>  	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
> @@ -753,7 +742,19 @@ finish_ret_to_user:
>  	bl	stackleak_erase
>  #endif
>  	kernel_exit 0
> -ENDPROC(ret_to_user)
> +
> +/*
> + * Ok, we need to do extra processing, enter the slow path.
> + */
> +work_pending:
> +	mov	x0, sp				// 'regs'
> +	bl	do_notify_resume
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> +	bl	trace_hardirqs_on		// enabled while in userspace
> +#endif
> +	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]	// re-check for single-step
> +	b	finish_ret_to_user
> +SYM_CODE_END(ret_to_user)
>  
>  	.popsection				// .entry.text
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index ddcde093c433..73e2c8f5b728 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -727,21 +727,10 @@  el0_error_naked:
 	b	ret_to_user
 SYM_CODE_END(el0_error)
 
-/*
- * Ok, we need to do extra processing, enter the slow path.
- */
-work_pending:
-	mov	x0, sp				// 'regs'
-	bl	do_notify_resume
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-	bl	trace_hardirqs_on		// enabled while in userspace
-#endif
-	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]	// re-check for single-step
-	b	finish_ret_to_user
 /*
  * "slow" syscall return path.
  */
-ret_to_user:
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(ret_to_user)
 	disable_daif
 	gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
 	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
@@ -753,7 +742,19 @@  finish_ret_to_user:
 	bl	stackleak_erase
 #endif
 	kernel_exit 0
-ENDPROC(ret_to_user)
+
+/*
+ * Ok, we need to do extra processing, enter the slow path.
+ */
+work_pending:
+	mov	x0, sp				// 'regs'
+	bl	do_notify_resume
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+	bl	trace_hardirqs_on		// enabled while in userspace
+#endif
+	ldr	x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]	// re-check for single-step
+	b	finish_ret_to_user
+SYM_CODE_END(ret_to_user)
 
 	.popsection				// .entry.text