| Message ID | 20200513103828.74580-1-maz@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | ce6f8f02f9f6786355fa6c79d88b839639dd75d8 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM: arm64: Use cpus_have_final_cap for has_vhe() | expand |
Hi Marc, > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> Thanks, this is really helpful for the 'Split off nVHE code' series. Tested them together and things seem to work just fine. David
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h index 61fd26752adc..5051b388c654 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void) static __always_inline bool has_vhe(void) { - if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN)) + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN)) return true; return false;
By the time we start using the has_vhe() helper, we have long discovered whether we are running VHE or not. It thus makes sense to use cpus_have_final_cap() instead of cpus_have_const_cap(), which leads to a small text size reduction. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)