diff mbox series

[2/3] KVM: arm64: Stop save/restoring ACTLR_EL1

Message ID 20200526161834.29165-3-james.morse@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: arm64: aarch32 ACTLR accesses | expand

Commit Message

James Morse May 26, 2020, 4:18 p.m. UTC
KVM sets HCR_EL2.TACR (which it calls HCR_TAC) via HCR_GUEST_FLAGS.
This means ACTLR* accesses from the guest are always trapped, and
always return the value in the sys_regs array.

The guest can't change the value of these registers, so we are
save restoring the reset value, which came from the host.

Stop save/restoring this register.

This also stops this register being affected by sysregs_loaded_on_cpu,
so we can provide 32 bit accessors that always use the in-memory copy.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c      | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Marc Zyngier May 28, 2020, 12:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2020-05-26 17:18, James Morse wrote:
> KVM sets HCR_EL2.TACR (which it calls HCR_TAC) via HCR_GUEST_FLAGS.

TAC is a leftover from 32bit.

> This means ACTLR* accesses from the guest are always trapped, and
> always return the value in the sys_regs array.
> 
> The guest can't change the value of these registers, so we are
> save restoring the reset value, which came from the host.
> 
> Stop save/restoring this register.
> 
> This also stops this register being affected by sysregs_loaded_on_cpu,
> so we can provide 32 bit accessors that always use the in-memory copy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 2 --
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c      | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c 
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index 75b1925763f1..57116cf3a1a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
> __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>  	ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(csselr_el1);
>  	ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR);
> -	ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(actlr_el1);
>  	ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_CPACR);
>  	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR0);
>  	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR1);
> @@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
> __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  		isb();
>  	}
> 
> -	write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],		actlr_el1);

If we don't need to save/restore it, we can also drop its presence
in the sys_regs array.

>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1],	SYS_CPACR);
>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1],	SYS_TTBR0);
>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1],	SYS_TTBR1);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 2eda539f3281..aae58513025c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> int reg)
>  	switch (reg) {
>  	case CSSELR_EL1:	return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CSSELR_EL1);
>  	case SCTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_SCTLR_EL12);
> -	case ACTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_ACTLR_EL1);
>  	case CPACR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CPACR_EL12);
>  	case TTBR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR0_EL12);
>  	case TTBR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR1_EL12);
> @@ -124,7 +123,6 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
> val, int reg)
>  	switch (reg) {
>  	case CSSELR_EL1:	write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CSSELR_EL1);	return;
>  	case SCTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_SCTLR_EL12);	return;
> -	case ACTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_ACTLR_EL1);	return;
>  	case CPACR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CPACR_EL12);	return;
>  	case TTBR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR0_EL12);	return;
>  	case TTBR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR1_EL12);	return;

It strikes me that we don't even have a trap handler for this sysreg,
whether it is 32 or 64bit... That's a bit unfortunate, to say the
least...

         M.
Marc Zyngier May 28, 2020, 12:38 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2020-05-28 13:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-05-26 17:18, James Morse wrote:
>> KVM sets HCR_EL2.TACR (which it calls HCR_TAC) via HCR_GUEST_FLAGS.
> 
> TAC is a leftover from 32bit.
> 
>> This means ACTLR* accesses from the guest are always trapped, and
>> always return the value in the sys_regs array.
>> 
>> The guest can't change the value of these registers, so we are
>> save restoring the reset value, which came from the host.
>> 
>> Stop save/restoring this register.
>> 
>> This also stops this register being affected by sysregs_loaded_on_cpu,
>> so we can provide 32 bit accessors that always use the in-memory copy.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 2 --
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c      | 2 --
>>  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c 
>> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> index 75b1925763f1..57116cf3a1a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
>> __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>>  {
>>  	ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(csselr_el1);
>>  	ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR);
>> -	ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(actlr_el1);
>>  	ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_CPACR);
>>  	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR0);
>>  	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR1);
>> @@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
>> __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>>  		isb();
>>  	}
>> 
>> -	write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],		actlr_el1);
> 
> If we don't need to save/restore it, we can also drop its presence
> in the sys_regs array.
> 
>>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1],	SYS_CPACR);
>>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1],	SYS_TTBR0);
>>  	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1],	SYS_TTBR1);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 2eda539f3281..aae58513025c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
>> int reg)
>>  	switch (reg) {
>>  	case CSSELR_EL1:	return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CSSELR_EL1);
>>  	case SCTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_SCTLR_EL12);
>> -	case ACTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_ACTLR_EL1);
>>  	case CPACR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CPACR_EL12);
>>  	case TTBR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR0_EL12);
>>  	case TTBR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR1_EL12);
>> @@ -124,7 +123,6 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
>> val, int reg)
>>  	switch (reg) {
>>  	case CSSELR_EL1:	write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CSSELR_EL1);	return;
>>  	case SCTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_SCTLR_EL12);	return;
>> -	case ACTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_ACTLR_EL1);	return;
>>  	case CPACR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CPACR_EL12);	return;
>>  	case TTBR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR0_EL12);	return;
>>  	case TTBR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR1_EL12);	return;
> 
> It strikes me that we don't even have a trap handler for this sysreg,
> whether it is 32 or 64bit... That's a bit unfortunate, to say the
> least...

Ah, no. the sucker is hidden away in "generic_v8"...

         M.
James Morse May 28, 2020, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Marc,

On 28/05/2020 13:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-05-28 13:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-05-26 17:18, James Morse wrote:
>>> KVM sets HCR_EL2.TACR (which it calls HCR_TAC) via HCR_GUEST_FLAGS.
>>> This means ACTLR* accesses from the guest are always trapped, and
>>> always return the value in the sys_regs array.
>>>
>>> The guest can't change the value of these registers, so we are
>>> save restoring the reset value, which came from the host.
>>>
>>> Stop save/restoring this register.
>>>
>>> This also stops this register being affected by sysregs_loaded_on_cpu,
>>> so we can provide 32 bit accessors that always use the in-memory copy.

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>>> index 75b1925763f1..57116cf3a1a5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c

>>> @@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
>>> __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>>>          isb();
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -    write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],        actlr_el1);
>>
>> If we don't need to save/restore it, we can also drop its presence
>> in the sys_regs array.

So even user-space accesses read from the hardware register? Fine by me.


>> It strikes me that we don't even have a trap handler for this sysreg,
>> whether it is 32 or 64bit... That's a bit unfortunate, to say the
>> least...
> 
> Ah, no. the sucker is hidden away in "generic_v8"...

That thing is A7/A15 (and then user-ABI) legacy right?

I was looking at ripping all that out when I ran over these. RFC grade, known not to bisect:
http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-jm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kvm_kill_target_table/v0


Thanks,

James
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
index 75b1925763f1..57116cf3a1a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
 {
 	ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(csselr_el1);
 	ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR);
-	ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1]	= read_sysreg(actlr_el1);
 	ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_CPACR);
 	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR0);
 	ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1]	= read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR1);
@@ -133,7 +132,6 @@  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
 		isb();
 	}
 
-	write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],		actlr_el1);
 	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1],	SYS_CPACR);
 	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1],	SYS_TTBR0);
 	write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1],	SYS_TTBR1);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 2eda539f3281..aae58513025c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@  u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
 	switch (reg) {
 	case CSSELR_EL1:	return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CSSELR_EL1);
 	case SCTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_SCTLR_EL12);
-	case ACTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_ACTLR_EL1);
 	case CPACR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CPACR_EL12);
 	case TTBR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR0_EL12);
 	case TTBR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR1_EL12);
@@ -124,7 +123,6 @@  void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg)
 	switch (reg) {
 	case CSSELR_EL1:	write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CSSELR_EL1);	return;
 	case SCTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_SCTLR_EL12);	return;
-	case ACTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_ACTLR_EL1);	return;
 	case CPACR_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CPACR_EL12);	return;
 	case TTBR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR0_EL12);	return;
 	case TTBR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR1_EL12);	return;