From patchwork Wed Jun 3 17:57:50 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miquel Raynal X-Patchwork-Id: 11586099 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16FA913 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57D52068D for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="iWlCw04n" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A57D52068D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ghJVtphMcIOyDzfj/jUfOiOT75JiXLijLWRpR7ZWXM4=; b=iWlCw04nbf1b7P 8MNuNmI7NXGeDKJzWPOLxyWNMXbWl39ZLl39DbCghT6pnyC3sA3V4jKnhN4bjMNaP+1EXruvlMGka uaRRt4ieuicCN8LqbUTN2iQ+GRVI8L22ePntReCNgBJ+1amAhGR1uAt7Vvv4wUYn+3tyk6Kcrqg4/ EoROpnY0dMCdykQg+emg85T3HcDaTQBpX2NckBYLhwiPeDgB3dIgWNAoSHy7owX7yPchtwFE5mcY+ dZV7OEM4cj1qF83UcG8AKMyT8dIJkkjEazVJV483z917Ew24hvcZQ6vAa/LKFufGhZKGB+p0izTMI K/u/U2Sc87uwftXAFoZA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgXjP-0003Oo-12; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 18:03:15 +0000 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgXem-0005JF-6a; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [91.224.148.103]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E51DB24000B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:58:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Miquel Raynal To: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Subject: [PATCH v10 11/20] mtd: nand: Create a helper to extract the ECC configuration Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:57:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20200603175759.19948-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200603175759.19948-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20200603175759.19948-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200603_105828_429364_2E727A7D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.66 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.178.230 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Julien Su , Miquel Raynal , Rob Herring , Thomas Petazzoni , Boris Brezillon , Mason Yang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Despite its current name, the eccreq field actually encodes both the NAND requirements and the final ECC configuration. That works fine when using on-die ECC since those 2 concepts match perfectly, but it starts being a problem as soon as we use on-host ECC engines, where we're not guaranteed to have a perfect match. Let's hide the ECC configuration access behind a helper so we can later split those 2 concepts. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal --- include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h index 8cf5bdbea782..9cbb41a5541c 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h @@ -523,6 +523,16 @@ nanddev_get_memorg(struct nand_device *nand) return &nand->memorg; } +/** + * nanddev_get_ecc_conf() - Extract the ECC configuration from a NAND device + * @nand: NAND device + */ +static inline const struct nand_ecc_props * +nanddev_get_ecc_conf(struct nand_device *nand) +{ + return &nand->eccreq; +} + int nanddev_init(struct nand_device *nand, const struct nand_ops *ops, struct module *owner); void nanddev_cleanup(struct nand_device *nand);