From patchwork Fri Jul 17 23:47:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11671463 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD721392 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E7C2074B for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="INfCCtq3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="vCqye4rH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9E7C2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eSSE91ufik/3/AF/HlQKWPm2ea3R8PPHcaeTzUJoo9s=; b=INfCCtq3HXuaJ+UMxo312obeB xmGQFBurx4JsF4PNT7ptE3uEdLWf/V9mty/BWHKMbG0ukcwnHe/Wp703cIXFP0y1zWGSrMfS0LqJF CVJdMs6b1B2KKTCelk/Gxg0qLfrEOkPiV87UDgV4zRyTrKe5GXOSWNFqKFXugEC9nM4YqLCoh+vHV tAVu9f2ik4+7Dz7q6vuPoZQ2mlsS7gCtIRBraiWvvCYSvAtpIcLFv1RpI0ar8Bb0PP7WjQd9hOOqk KCBgo3qo7u26UNXBu9zFrQMrZ0tSeABtqte9MN1CXLeT489PUkiIvCbQ+APTZWIz9ZsEa1JxoTbiz HgfMbq8Ig==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5T-0007Ms-Ib; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:19 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jwa5K-0007Jp-Tt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:48:12 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm7PJ083783; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595029687; bh=jHlH05tXGOLRwWsXUTZTLlAmGKwGHC7r1J05PDf0zoA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=vCqye4rHRTzTuGZJU9erSElVcIdYgoIZxjeQ1Lw6yUoAJnA5YoGyPaura7+jnel+M lzd1BUwb4u9dygXbEIjQmWvexvNoviAJ/9W8FmYhYABVKPx96tUxmdNt1gPJht3xtD INyOV4eyUV+kzZJuBx2gIQyPsSe1YBqeiYXRsdHw= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06HNm73P042654 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:07 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06HNm662037411; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.34.57]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 06HNm6ZI108262; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:48:06 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:47:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20200717234800.9423-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200717234800.9423-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200717_194811_094866_F0F73C5E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.58 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.248 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.23.248 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v4: No changes v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602327/ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init); +/** + * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name + * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc + * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval + * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware + * name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise. + * + * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for + * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer + * in @fw_name on success. + * + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure. + */ +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name) +{ + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name", + index, fw_name); + return ret ? ret : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware); + /* * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in * enum fw_resource_type. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { void rproc_release(struct kref *kref); irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, + const char **fw_name); /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id);