From patchwork Tue Aug 18 15:16:21 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Rapoport X-Patchwork-Id: 11721557 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6661739 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC2C2054F for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pp5hlPAW"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Sb4tO818" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7AC2C2054F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=FyK4pEJwwA3EMjKSttU8Hgha2lMklUamEb6jFNbA7JM=; b=pp5hlPAW10tX6oqQQJacrKVI6 wv4kn8NfYPgWF6nuMddDX1bvvwF4ze+D0PsrmyCNKbOGDopdmxxI7Gsu42AQiEsh6jc/ZyxbDKT/H GhF8AJCSfjhYc2WFsSVXrmHJZwYLHZhc+hnNycf+79RLJ9XjQbO60GJKxq768bOhT5XkEIASgXyiu QezcK2OGSodzcrVSMhZ/dCPL+1X//OkrIdTJvluGJt2HARHuSVYmw71T5ZmU4P1F4bGUCUxRttkju C/ukn6LmpW/LT2OdIsgXDXAJD82EL+j638xEliYIIqw9U3qqQc1Da8dxgz3GHwM9gLZ0brPH4TN8m cjoQaECcQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k83NM-0007Uu-Ku; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:18:12 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k83Mj-00077R-ET; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:17:36 +0000 Received: from aquarius.haifa.ibm.com (nesher1.haifa.il.ibm.com [195.110.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E54462054F; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:17:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597763852; bh=DFgjPvI/vXV91uvzN+sme20WtWl/kJKoZupsBOJXfBQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sb4tO818fhfIY1L0sTQE8nDj+8mGi9uHOcqZnjg0uj3tpj6i4/rzppzDqqqompdjZ iFUaYJr4fueUpI5iPhsaxdXJPjYQyvH1ESfKCPejy1fi1XGVCto65QLI3+mssBbcEL 8tsVYJMK/jhJgOVkQ7iYEV+fVy8vBFUiHXB5XJsI= From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH v3 04/17] arm64: numa: simplify dummy_numa_init() Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 18:16:21 +0300 Message-Id: <20200818151634.14343-5-rppt@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200818151634.14343-1-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20200818151634.14343-1-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200818_111733_783604_8CA56B9D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.88 ) X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-5.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.145.29.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Emil Renner Berthing , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Baoquan He , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Mike Rapoport , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Walmsley , Stafford Horne , Hari Bathini , Daniel Axtens , Michal Simek , Yoshinori Sato , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Jonathan Cameron , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Mike Rapoport Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Mike Rapoport dummy_numa_init() loops over memblock.memory and passes nid=0 to numa_add_memblk() which essentially wraps memblock_set_node(). However, memblock_set_node() can cope with entire memory span itself, so the loop over memblock.memory regions is redundant. Using a single call to memblock_set_node() rather than a loop also fixes an issue with a buggy ACPI firmware in which the SRAT table covers some but not all of the memory in the EFI memory map. Jonathan Cameron says: This issue can be easily triggered by having an SRAT table which fails to cover all elements of the EFI memory map. This firmware error is detected and a warning printed. e.g. "NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node 64 [mem 0x240000000-0x27fffffff]" At that point we fall back to dummy_numa_init(). However, the failed ACPI init has left us with our memblocks all broken up as we split them when trying to assign them to NUMA nodes. We then iterate over the memblocks and add them to node 0. numa_add_memblk() calls memblock_set_node() which merges regions that were previously split up during the earlier attempt to add them to different nodes during parsing of SRAT. This means elements are moved in the memblock array and we can end up in a different memblock after the call to numa_add_memblk(). Result is: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000003a40 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 CM = 0, WnR = 0 [0000000000003a40] user address but active_mm is swapper Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ... Call trace: sparse_init_nid+0x5c/0x2b0 sparse_init+0x138/0x170 bootmem_init+0x80/0xe0 setup_arch+0x2a0/0x5fc start_kernel+0x8c/0x648 Replace the loop with a single call to memblock_set_node() to the entire memory. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Acked-by: Catalin Marinas --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index 73f8b49d485c..8a97cd3d2dfe 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c @@ -423,19 +423,16 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) */ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) { + phys_addr_t start = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); + phys_addr_t end = memblock_end_of_DRAM(); int ret; - struct memblock_region *mblk; if (numa_off) pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */ - pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", - memblock_start_of_DRAM(), memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1); - - for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) { - ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->base + mblk->size); - if (!ret) - continue; + pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", start, end - 1); + ret = numa_add_memblk(0, start, end); + if (ret) { pr_err("NUMA init failed\n"); return ret; }