From patchwork Fri Oct 2 23:42:34 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11814773 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857EF139A for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 23:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D69206A2 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 23:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Yp9c4sPq"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="BuUMXJdC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 49D69206A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZOx6JPCiOq/Q+3bdb0AQVz7SIpgVdyZlCdx98WN87cA=; b=Yp9c4sPqr3YCjKtTR+0/YAD7W X1SzgqCz3SVuqReITnyUXejyLJ+GrEYQzD7uuqvIFrmIFyK17p5POedpjzcKJzHyY0FUVSCh+koUb TpZgeBGMOIyY3DiPL7+faEOMfp3ubvq4T09EtzvaVIOP9Ha+nFvzAGPmOAfhassYdscdZSc6gQ9IU 9r1ryDT/wcHAjg8MND4JYpqLNAuDgbpkQJJWMsn/u+zqrqm/fViGoLSRId7JF9Hd5ajzvcGxVKpl9 U2ikk12/qgNEIffDZgpUwYUmlOXYwwG+q/l1LGAXcwsphA+gPl8yTcWIdMpTXHYcMA2nEhwnoGUgf RPwMVEI6w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOUhv-00053l-RQ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:43:23 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOUhm-0004ze-H2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:43:18 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 092NhCke113938; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1601682192; bh=6vDIAAtQ422jePYZhpDlS5n568H+gYX7ISPY+qj9IPo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=BuUMXJdC/LHQbJr3Onjfm3kjX/OpGk8g37TsVIGshyk8VHWK8lh3Mtllk+NGTZDKL wPD9f/4CLnCywo6cjBlxfdx84Hz5adzhbx2FXQaV3w7jf1FcJV6GIJs8GYj97whFru ndoazhWyttByhu+2oU6oOvPAQaaFL03r6RGbDg7s= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 092NhCDo041922 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:12 -0500 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:12 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 092NhBlQ069908; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:12 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.37.92]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 092NhBJ3113423; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:43:11 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Add loading support for on-chip SRAM regions Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:42:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20201002234234.20704-5-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201002234234.20704-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20201002234234.20704-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201002_194314_717754_52F77FDB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.71 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.19.142 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The K3 SoCs has various internal on-chip SRAM memories like the SRAM within the MCU domain or the shared MSMC RAM within NavSS that can be used for multiple purposes. One such purpose is to have the R5F cores use a portion of such on-chip SRAM for fast-access data or to directly execute code. Add support to the K3 R5 remoteproc driver to parse and support loading into such memories. The SRAM regions need to be mapped as normal non-cacheable memory to avoid kernel crashes when the remoteproc loader code uses the Arm64 memset library function (the "DC ZVA" instruction throws a alignment fault on device type memory). These SRAM regions are completely optional as not all firmware images require these memories, and any such memory has to be reserved as such in the DTS files. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v5: No changes v4: No changes v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11679329/ - No code changes, picked up review tags v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11632991/ v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456373/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index a6b395ab47b6..d9307935441d 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ struct k3_r5_cluster { * @dev: cached device pointer * @rproc: rproc handle representing this core * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @sram: on-chip SRAM memory regions data * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @num_sram: number of on-chip SRAM memory regions * @reset: reset control handle * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle @@ -99,7 +101,9 @@ struct k3_r5_core { struct device *dev; struct rproc *rproc; struct k3_r5_mem *mem; + struct k3_r5_mem *sram; int num_mems; + int num_sram; struct reset_control *reset; struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; @@ -587,6 +591,18 @@ static void *k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } } + /* handle any SRAM regions using SoC-view addresses */ + for (i = 0; i < core->num_sram; i++) { + dev_addr = core->sram[i].dev_addr; + size = core->sram[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = core->sram[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; @@ -1027,6 +1043,63 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, return 0; } +static int k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_r5_core *core) +{ + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *sram_np; + struct resource res; + int num_sram; + int i, ret; + + num_sram = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "sram", sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_sram <= 0) { + dev_dbg(dev, "device does not use reserved on-chip memories, num_sram = %d\n", + num_sram); + return 0; + } + + core->sram = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_sram, sizeof(*core->sram), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!core->sram) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_sram; i++) { + sram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "sram", i); + if (!sram_np) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!of_device_is_available(sram_np)) { + of_node_put(sram_np); + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = of_address_to_resource(sram_np, 0, &res); + of_node_put(sram_np); + if (ret) + return -EINVAL; + + core->sram[i].bus_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].dev_addr = res.start; + core->sram[i].size = resource_size(&res); + core->sram[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res.start, + resource_size(&res)); + if (!core->sram[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse and map sram%d memory at %pad\n", + i, &res.start); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory sram%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i, &core->sram[i].bus_addr, + core->sram[i].size, core->sram[i].cpu_addr, + core->sram[i].dev_addr); + } + core->num_sram = num_sram; + + return 0; +} + static struct ti_sci_proc *k3_r5_core_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) @@ -1142,6 +1215,12 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err; } + ret = k3_r5_core_of_get_sram_memories(pdev, core); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get sram memories, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto err; + } + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(core->tsp); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret);