From patchwork Thu Nov 12 17:53:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kishon Vijay Abraham I X-Patchwork-Id: 11900893 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5354C5519F for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4FA216C4 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="QPQTd4ZO"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="K2gUBEpw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A4FA216C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=t9Hy4/pGK+SNy6etJd3QYXsFcd5NHXMlse1P+DYKFiE=; b=QPQTd4ZO3tnodf/RxUZ6vz+HC vKhpCFXYOvGoUEe3TWHUJqSQLNjtlCcd7uvgL+//tme/sqVkoU5j8N6MX57wjRAeQrNqpFjA/xOIq At8sbCIE2R1B8Apogpc6M1ct1VjfTtWbJOrkFJYydCWP5MNGrsjmLy0LeUxpKDgslfgZP7jvZLbg6 qEj90T4+Iwh1JzZH3iCTxaLUFOigoIn+rojC7AhxpjsMIRwtKB1wnngo/F6cYLY3cvoJr57JtBB67 ekga7KZcvYB5D/e9EE1wg6QhaXbXHMshhRS4deNjFTsDlG9ONO6yFkkee41+4c6/o0qCKEqqKJWIE QJFWbDIrg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdGoM-0003UY-1e; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:55:06 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdGnp-0003Jj-Lm; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:54:37 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACHsOjT028195; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:24 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605203664; bh=xZP94/W6e+feo2IXbD5QHf0IlP942uGU++0kfiWPUQA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=K2gUBEpwuPFGgs2crUGHMQtNsAnZLlHQ2EUHcCZKQ6f1qbeLAKiMGhsRgkQ4akVGb 5P7tCP3ZqLjX3zb3qXgD09232IGm5RGgDpxXZZnJk5UnoPLWkKH15VvXBx9RPVwBQX 8zz5Fr+PS6BENsnFQFnYXzGuqZXJapW9udKSdroQ= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ACHsO4B006284 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:24 -0600 Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:24 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:24 -0600 Received: from a0393678-ssd.dal.design.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACHrx9t094087; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:54:19 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Tom Joseph , Jingoo Han , Gustavo Pimentel , Marek Vasut , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Shawn Lin , Heiko Stuebner Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] PCI: endpoint: Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 23:23:55 +0530 Message-ID: <20201112175358.2653-4-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20201112175358.2653-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20201112175358.2653-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201112_125433_869455_E4A2E2F5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org While the physical function has to be linked to endpoint controller, the virtual function has to be linked to a physical function. Add support to link a physical function to a virtual function in pci-ep-cfs. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c index f3a8b833b479..999911801877 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c @@ -475,6 +475,28 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *pci_epf_attrs[] = { NULL, }; +static int pci_epf_vepf_link(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + return pci_epf_add_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + +static void pci_epf_vepf_unlink(struct config_item *epf_pf_item, + struct config_item *epf_vf_item) +{ + struct pci_epf_group *epf_vf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_vf_item); + struct pci_epf_group *epf_pf_group = to_pci_epf_group(epf_pf_item); + struct pci_epf *epf_pf = epf_pf_group->epf; + struct pci_epf *epf_vf = epf_vf_group->epf; + + pci_epf_remove_vepf(epf_pf, epf_vf); +} + static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) { struct pci_epf_group *epf_group = to_pci_epf_group(item); @@ -487,6 +509,8 @@ static void pci_epf_release(struct config_item *item) } static struct configfs_item_operations pci_epf_ops = { + .allow_link = pci_epf_vepf_link, + .drop_link = pci_epf_vepf_unlink, .release = pci_epf_release, };