From patchwork Mon Nov 23 16:20:08 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cristian Marussi X-Patchwork-Id: 11925681 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B338C2D0E4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F287A2080A for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="r7vdi0nV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F287A2080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=8h3IcforuZaGFVFrnvzaIt8Brbsfr/3MHJnaxO+gmko=; b=r7vdi0nVTL4MEwiRyaz7ek0hkl m8SI7GH65mZNZzJv+bP2/O6hD6mWyK7PZhcRKodRHbC+jfy5kvx9wRFNq42u/4dRsRzIY0QtxwLDT t53RECMluNSdFLVEVVx/KQv6zcuTmE6/SE7oolo1arZn0iq1ui7eNoM83VaU16oWlcPF6RaJl116h caU7s1/FacpiyQGEr7XO8frRkYxP7iZXyUD6S9QBAXzxRCBaDjZmbnhaFSU9yNBfIpAgn2zSi1kMy r6SRC/P7iwaovQNvUf61E4mGneOnNs2kJMAfUMU+nSuweQCmC3KNp8kVbCQa6jjlUog3XvUcOqefY qT5o1ISg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khEZo-0005lM-Bi; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:20:28 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khEZl-0005kB-VP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:20:27 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB09D1396; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DAB83F718; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:20:22 -0800 (PST) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: remove residual _le structs naming Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:20:08 +0000 Message-Id: <20201123162008.35814-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201123_112026_120077_98F3EB65 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Cristian Marussi , sudeep.holla@arm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org For sake of consistency, remove any residual naming based on _le suffixes in SCMI Sensors Protocol, since little endianity is already assumed across all of SCMI implementation and, as such, all currently existent names do not explicitly state their endianness. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- Based on for-next/scmi commit e3811190acf8 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.0 sensor notifications") Thanks Cristian --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c index b3d7c08c09a0..4541b891b733 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ struct scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete { __le64 readings; }; -struct scmi_sensor_reading_le { +struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp { __le32 sensor_value_low; __le32 sensor_value_high; __le32 timestamp_low; @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct scmi_sensor_reading_le { struct scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete_v3 { __le32 id; - struct scmi_sensor_reading_le readings[]; + struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp readings[]; }; struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld { @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld { struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld { __le32 agent_id; __le32 sensor_id; - struct scmi_sensor_reading_le readings[]; + struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp readings[]; }; struct sensors_info { @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static int scmi_sensor_reading_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, static inline void scmi_parse_sensor_readings(struct scmi_sensor_reading *out, - const struct scmi_sensor_reading_le *in) + const struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp *in) { out->value = get_unaligned_le64((void *)&in->sensor_value_low); out->timestamp = get_unaligned_le64((void *)&in->timestamp_low); @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ scmi_sensor_reading_get_timestamped(const struct scmi_handle *handle, ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); if (!ret) { int i; - struct scmi_sensor_reading_le *resp_readings; + struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp *resp_readings; resp_readings = t->rx.buf; for (i = 0; i < count; i++) @@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static const struct scmi_event sensor_events[] = { .max_payld_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld) + SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS * - sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_reading_le), + sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp), .max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_update_report) + SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS * sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_reading),