From patchwork Tue Nov 24 15:50:27 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 11929273 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C654C63777 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3679206F7 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="uhQHemao"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kGlPm1hA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D3679206F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Lq5lW/GqPJWdzkfye0FfrDRGIn0FtvDOYZA5HgAXC28=; b=uhQHemaoeJcx4+14IKyAjtmxY kuPsqmO32KTg1jZHYMgmSFaMCKDE889pvK+WCv+KFnVCiu/+4NB+LT1fUfB58yyCYUFlbESRKsg99 gjU71TSLq0kvy/ngXKznC+x1BO9/DAoyoIWyT32Gk2LtHjZXMdEdOdvrIfr5DQM+y+dx2UPlVhPns hzi086+o6+gAwHEPvWa8JIy8dNV8UU+GKwTp6S0HrfNZIFeoS8qLPZsN9jMCIVi8CucSgWAoPShmg 8JEvN7qxTFw5gjVhklWub0YwofgPCmwmOk0Jplllf3KZcg04aUoKUWeax+5J9AVgRVCHGRiwUZ2k/ HL039oemw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khaav-0004vD-JF; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:51:05 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khaao-0004tJ-0U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:50:59 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E154920870; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:50:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606233057; bh=6tMitz639STs+groZFL7NDiATRtBOx6fee52ISkVdU0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kGlPm1hAfCpM2gBcQ85/4cJJDRl+t2SFErlkESXORjpPtsj1cbJjurcVpzzY0BNGl g8MveVFwaYNTtXU7MW52Cxy5CQ2vQQeCCVWWQb5VGJgkxZgHVXqspRkbC0uZDhekXX M2VRCA0Cd/8zcMurxs9RTaiVDlCGn/MYdmUj23O8= From: Will Deacon To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:50:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20201124155039.13804-3-will@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20201124155039.13804-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20201124155039.13804-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201124_105058_275924_A1C719A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , kernel-team@android.com, Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Quentin Perret , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef , Suren Baghdasaryan , Ingo Molnar , Li Zefan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , Will Deacon , Morten Rasmussen Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org When confronted with a mixture of CPUs, some of which support 32-bit applications and others which don't, we quite sensibly treat the system as 64-bit only for userspace and prevent execve() of 32-bit binaries. Unfortunately, some crazy folks have decided to build systems like this with the intention of running 32-bit applications, so relax our sanitisation logic to continue to advertise 32-bit support to userspace on these systems and track the real 32-bit capable cores in a cpumask instead. For now, the default behaviour remains but will be tied to a command-line option in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 ++- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h index e7d98997c09c..e6f0eb4643a0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ #define ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO 10 #define ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN 11 #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_27456 12 -#define ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 13 +#define ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE 13 #define ARM64_HARDEN_EL2_VECTORS 14 #define ARM64_HAS_CNP 15 #define ARM64_HAS_NO_FPSIMD 16 diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 97244d4feca9..f447d313a9c5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -604,9 +604,15 @@ static inline bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void) return id_aa64mmfr0_mixed_endian_el0(read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1)); } +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void); +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + static inline bool system_supports_32bit_el0(void) { - return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0); + u64 pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1); + + return id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(pfr0) || + static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); } static inline bool system_supports_4kb_granule(void) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index d4a7e84b1513..bc71a51f1b9c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -104,6 +104,24 @@ DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE); bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false; EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings); +/* + * Permit PER_LINUX32 and execve() of 32-bit binaries even if not all CPUs + * support it? + */ +static bool __read_mostly allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + +/* + * Static branch enabled only if allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 is set and we have + * seen at least one CPU capable of 32-bit EL0. + */ +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + +/* + * Mask of CPUs supporting 32-bit EL0. + * Only valid if arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0 is enabled. + */ +static cpumask_var_t cpu_32bit_el0_mask __cpumask_var_read_mostly; + /* * Flag to indicate if we have computed the system wide * capabilities based on the boot time active CPUs. This @@ -756,7 +774,7 @@ static void __init sort_ftr_regs(void) * Any bits that are not covered by an arm64_ftr_bits entry are considered * RES0 for the system-wide value, and must strictly match. */ -static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) +static void init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) { u64 val = 0; u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL; @@ -819,7 +837,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_hwcaps_indirect_list(void) static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void); -static void __init init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) +static void init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) { init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0); init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr1); @@ -935,6 +953,25 @@ static void relax_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int field) WARN_ON(!ftrp->width); } +static void update_compat_elf_hwcaps(void); + +static void update_mismatched_32bit_el0_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info, + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot) +{ + static bool boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = false; + + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 || boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden) + return; + + if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(boot->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) + return; + + boot->aarch32 = info->aarch32; + init_32bit_cpu_features(&boot->aarch32); + update_compat_elf_hwcaps(); + boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = true; +} + static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info, struct cpuinfo_32bit *boot) { @@ -1095,6 +1132,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, * (e.g. SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), so we call it last. */ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) { + update_mismatched_32bit_el0_cpu_features(info, boot); taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, &info->aarch32, &boot->aarch32); } @@ -1196,6 +1234,55 @@ has_cpuid_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) return feature_matches(val, entry); } +static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu); + bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0); + + if (cpu_32bit) { + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask); + static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int __init init_32bit_el0_mask(void) +{ + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0) + return 0; + + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_32bit_el0_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + + return cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, + "arm64/mismatched_32bit_el0:online", + enable_mismatched_32bit_el0, NULL); +} +subsys_initcall_sync(init_32bit_el0_mask); + +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void) +{ + if (!system_supports_32bit_el0()) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + return cpu_32bit_el0_mask; + + return cpu_possible_mask; +} + +static bool has_32bit_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) +{ + if (!has_cpuid_feature(entry, scope)) + return allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + + if (scope == SCOPE_SYSTEM) + pr_info("detected: 32-bit EL0 Support\n"); + + return true; +} + static bool has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) { bool has_sre; @@ -1803,10 +1890,9 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { }, #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_VHE */ { - .desc = "32-bit EL0 Support", - .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0, + .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE, - .matches = has_cpuid_feature, + .matches = has_32bit_el0, .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .sign = FTR_UNSIGNED, .field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT, @@ -2299,7 +2385,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities compat_elf_hwcaps[] = { {}, }; -static void __init cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) +static void cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) { switch (cap->hwcap_type) { case CAP_HWCAP: @@ -2344,7 +2430,7 @@ static bool cpus_have_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) return rc; } -static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) +static void setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) { /* We support emulation of accesses to CPU ID feature registers */ cpu_set_named_feature(CPUID); @@ -2353,6 +2439,12 @@ static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) cap_set_elf_hwcap(hwcaps); } +static void update_compat_elf_hwcaps(void) +{ + if (system_capabilities_finalized()) + setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); +} + static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask) { int i;