diff mbox series

[02/15] dt-bindings: i2c: imx: update schema to align with original binding

Message ID 20210205234734.3397-3-leoyang.li@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Cleanup of LS1021a device trees | expand

Commit Message

Leo Li Feb. 5, 2021, 11:47 p.m. UTC
Layerscape SoCs doesn't use ipg as clock name.  Remove the clock name
requirement in the schema.  Also the original binding doesn't enforce
the order of "tx" and "rx" in dma-names.  Both orders are used
extensively in existing dtses, update the schema to allow both.

Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 6, 2021, 11:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:47:21PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> Layerscape SoCs doesn't use ipg as clock name.  Remove the clock name
> requirement in the schema.  Also the original binding doesn't enforce
> the order of "tx" and "rx" in dma-names.  Both orders are used
> extensively in existing dtses, update the schema to allow both.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
> index f23966b0d6c6..57237b0b7d89 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
> @@ -54,20 +54,19 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>    clock-names:
> -    const: ipg
> +    maxItems: 1

No, for other SoCs the clock is I think required, so it should be there.
Add an allof-if statements to require it on specific compatibles and
skip on others.

>  
>    clock-frequency:
>      enum: [ 100000, 400000 ]
>  
>    dmas:
> -    items:
> -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 2
>  
>    dma-names:
>      items:
> -      - const: rx
> -      - const: tx
> +      - enum: [ "rx", "tx" ]
> +      - enum: [ "tx", "rx" ]

No, the order should be enforced. That was a generic recommendation from
Rob.

Also, I don't get the what does it mean "the original binding" in commit
msg. This is the original binding. Upstream. Mainline.

If your DTSes have different order, please adjust them, not the binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
index f23966b0d6c6..57237b0b7d89 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx.yaml
@@ -54,20 +54,19 @@  properties:
     maxItems: 1
 
   clock-names:
-    const: ipg
+    maxItems: 1
 
   clock-frequency:
     enum: [ 100000, 400000 ]
 
   dmas:
-    items:
-      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
-      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
+    minItems: 2
+    maxItems: 2
 
   dma-names:
     items:
-      - const: rx
-      - const: tx
+      - enum: [ "rx", "tx" ]
+      - enum: [ "tx", "rx" ]
 
   sda-gpios:
     maxItems: 1