From patchwork Wed Mar 3 07:33:15 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jing Xiangfeng X-Patchwork-Id: 12114189 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84AEC433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA48A64EF3 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:27:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BA48A64EF3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=qC2caDuyXXICOHnitfEzC6pyDRO6qHtCOgXqiDo3wq8=; b=EsTIuVDs3h+OJBLp6tTiN9Cke bCqRjh/anP+jB1Uny9FCxvEKM1TMIaxheJcgVQ9ouTtAEbaoYJaMwc/7HrmJ6i+qplEj8JUpYFfRV Jcrbcc/kUT7vFAXiAzBi4ezhCvvpPeBQ1GIODGWXyoIwXwqGN9y0v1OOY5CVAeb9ySYXeKM++JkQd tc9iX6Au85nw0dulG3I/0yUUfRogJAkpIbyjKaIQ5EAuNOX7bfv+Obf9YlOzcpz/5zGudNYBaR0mB W2OZBOlGn2wQGt7jCgdrXIDH0OLvNdRIUOXYu8Amgguy9G8/6F1srZK+N90MQeUZkecHBc9IEU/J7 uxxnjjGgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lHY0f-006OuX-2y; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 20:22:17 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lHT5U-005IkO-6X; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 15:06:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=pNK4phnjccVmfpoWfcAn4AA/bLEa3a3eoyZlvB7DlsY=; b=lcZcKx6w6Sc0KN3K+v4sbAwK3N Ab7Xwjdn83Djx57X1tLlQvp/1Od89jAH7pyfjACPGOzd8rkWWtS65raHYQs1/hO12ClV+qcFcxTqM BgWBJuCUNuE1S197egLkKgS2hTCRAu6u6aEokpNy8YslYrG76fnbfqema0EvfLa5WZkvJPxj3ZdKo 1ShoLS9aR/Q3cctWuPj8X9DQmd7Sk9tlyZR6Cmq9wVSc5Lhn1Rk9WqiZH5XmoeHcPtzBPky7oCsFv vuzQVWhl2Bj2wXSBq1Vrf02qjNmgeG+LQ7SRBSM3FJN603q3/QTyJrhJygQmZZunH3aN3H2l+NDgC blbQK4fA==; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lHLoL-001eYk-GC; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 07:20:46 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dr5271QYvzMh3S; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:18:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from ubuntu-82.huawei.com (10.175.104.82) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:20:22 +0800 From: Jing Xiangfeng To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH stable v5.10 3/7] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-4-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20210303073319.2215839-1-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> References: <20210303073319.2215839-1-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.104.82] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210303_072046_650858_B2D6A0D0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne commit 964db79d6c186cc2ecc6ae46f98eed7e0ea8cf71 upstream Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(), which provides the highest CPU physical address addressable by all DMA masters in the system. It's specially useful for setting memory zones sizes at early boot time. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Reviewed-by: Rob Herring Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-4-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Cc: Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng --- drivers/of/address.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c index 1c3257a2d4e3..73ddf2540f3f 100644 --- a/drivers/of/address.c +++ b/drivers/of/address.c @@ -1024,6 +1024,48 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, const struct bus_dma_region **map) } #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_DMA */ +/** + * of_dma_get_max_cpu_address - Gets highest CPU address suitable for DMA + * @np: The node to start searching from or NULL to start from the root + * + * Gets the highest CPU physical address that is addressable by all DMA masters + * in the sub-tree pointed by np, or the whole tree if NULL is passed. If no + * DMA constrained device is found, it returns PHYS_ADDR_MAX. + */ +phys_addr_t __init of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np) +{ + phys_addr_t max_cpu_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX; + struct of_range_parser parser; + phys_addr_t subtree_max_addr; + struct device_node *child; + struct of_range range; + const __be32 *ranges; + u64 cpu_end = 0; + int len; + + if (!np) + np = of_root; + + ranges = of_get_property(np, "dma-ranges", &len); + if (ranges && len) { + of_dma_range_parser_init(&parser, np); + for_each_of_range(&parser, &range) + if (range.cpu_addr + range.size > cpu_end) + cpu_end = range.cpu_addr + range.size - 1; + + if (max_cpu_addr > cpu_end) + max_cpu_addr = cpu_end; + } + + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) { + subtree_max_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(child); + if (max_cpu_addr > subtree_max_addr) + max_cpu_addr = subtree_max_addr; + } + + return max_cpu_addr; +} + /** * of_dma_is_coherent - Check if device is coherent * @np: device node diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h index af655d264f10..0f4e81e6fb23 100644 --- a/include/linux/of.h +++ b/include/linux/of.h @@ -558,6 +558,8 @@ int of_map_id(struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name, struct device_node **target, u32 *id_out); +phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np); + #else /* CONFIG_OF */ static inline void of_core_init(void) @@ -995,6 +997,11 @@ static inline int of_map_id(struct device_node *np, u32 id, return -EINVAL; } +static inline phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np) +{ + return PHYS_ADDR_MAX; +} + #define of_match_ptr(_ptr) NULL #define of_match_node(_matches, _node) NULL #endif /* CONFIG_OF */