From patchwork Wed Mar 10 10:20:13 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vladimir Murzin X-Patchwork-Id: 12127601 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346A7C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C93A64DF3 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4C93A64DF3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=P7Seh/LLxom+hFSI/JVJPXY6kMNVzTpHzRRZq4WxXIY=; b=pYt7j/PPfoZ8yQuou/c7vLZX1I 8MlpqeHn3OZmuBoOKVj6Ni9mreU7GZXP2j+K2nu0wsDB9aDwPCjHSOOPFaCmOdttt2WO4xf89BqF0 kx0eTlPQm5eqx/6O+Q6H3EB7jZ4hXO4tkkJG2IyZ4zfL1dmeNN61LH/9A/adgjJWVlK+kxsPSrAuG pxHa33J3ZbSDkeXwucNBt35Qeyei986vru0dexqX2isUAFYmKfBI9pbpQ3q8GAHMDEn63ofV8XfN+ oE9JbqMyQjKefmdMM5AKZhMY5TAJ3ni73nNlHVG1imIFXHgs96wxPxS5lvlWwT4POkXsOwhAWxtN0 JEGSn64Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lJvxR-006Zgv-49; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:20:49 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lJvxG-006ZfP-5Y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:20:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE041FB; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 02:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from login2.euhpc.arm.com (login2.euhpc.arm.com [10.6.27.34]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E5283F85F; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 02:20:33 -0800 (PST) From: Vladimir Murzin To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: rppt@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: NOMMU: Fix conversion for_each_membock() to for_each_mem_range() Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:20:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20210310102013.91253-1-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210310_102038_658449_7CBA3007 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org for_each_mem_range() uses a loop variable, yet looking into code it is not just iteration counter but more complex entity which encodes information about memblock. Thus condition i == 0 looks fragile. Indeed, it broke boot of R-class platforms since it never took i == 0 path (due to i was set to 1). Fix that with restoring original flag check. Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin Acked-by: Mike Rapoport --- arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c | 4 +++- arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c b/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c index 88950e41a3a9..59d916ccdf25 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ void __init pmsav7_adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) phys_addr_t mem_end; phys_addr_t reg_start, reg_end; unsigned int mem_max_regions; + bool first = true; int num; u64 i; @@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ void __init pmsav7_adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) #endif for_each_mem_range(i, ®_start, ®_end) { - if (i == 0) { + if (first) { phys_addr_t phys_offset = PHYS_OFFSET; /* @@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ void __init pmsav7_adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) mem_start = reg_start; mem_end = reg_end; specified_mem_size = mem_end - mem_start; + first = false; } else { /* * memblock auto merges contiguous blocks, remove diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c b/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c index 2de019f7503e..8359748a19a1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v8.c @@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ void __init pmsav8_adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) { phys_addr_t mem_end; phys_addr_t reg_start, reg_end; + bool first = true; u64 i; for_each_mem_range(i, ®_start, ®_end) { - if (i == 0) { + if (first) { phys_addr_t phys_offset = PHYS_OFFSET; /* @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ void __init pmsav8_adjust_lowmem_bounds(void) if (reg_start != phys_offset) panic("First memory bank must be contiguous from PHYS_OFFSET"); mem_end = reg_end; + first = false; } else { /* * memblock auto merges contiguous blocks, remove