From patchwork Tue Mar 16 12:48:29 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cristian Marussi X-Patchwork-Id: 12142141 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8B9C433DB for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD616504F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:53:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4AD616504F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=vZldG66uGufMg2kzUX2JwirohbPxbLOtJSIqZaohh8U=; b=o09NlrtGaXry51fcYilJFTwl0/ LMvBdhaHaeG9lQZXXojOYqElxluXv5K7CINaAHU2wNmRhIzhUR/PIQxtB5Fu7L+43JHrH3chS6YG7 FPViIiVB8Rpf1+J8KE7X8AzsM03EHupHb73kJEgaewbewz/U8V1qg9IfSrK+ZR4uqe9eRO0CnUqEz zTgwNwjGwQ0zYtbkL+RP4rWU7bw03ETOXaE94iST+U/Cky5sMyl/AfsQJdUXgTT9LGKadt4Ov7kTn GDrJz63Q5cmEaez/FzD0tlcvhm7Uh5x0pVsObQYnI4ccxfp/I7JmJqQIi4VoZqDWz80clAVh1+ovp 3SLax40w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lM9BD-000jR0-M3; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:52:11 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lM98f-000jIQ-Mj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:51:37 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB8411B3; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 05:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F16AE3F792; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v7 04/38] firmware: arm_scmi: make notifications aware of protocols users Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:48:29 +0000 Message-Id: <20210316124903.35011-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210316124903.35011-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20210316124903.35011-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210316_125134_945756_DA801456 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Account for any active registered notifier against the proper related protocol; do not consider pending event handlers, only active handlers will concur to protocol usage accounting. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- v6 --> v7 - renamed non-static function to fit scmi__ naming pattern --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c index 66196b293b6c..09015f1f9942 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ #include #include +#include "common.h" #include "notify.h" #define SCMI_MAX_PROTO 256 @@ -368,7 +369,7 @@ static struct scmi_event_handler * scmi_get_active_handler(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, u32 evt_key); static void scmi_put_active_handler(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, struct scmi_event_handler *hndl); -static void scmi_put_handler_unlocked(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, +static bool scmi_put_handler_unlocked(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, struct scmi_event_handler *hndl); /** @@ -900,9 +901,21 @@ static inline int scmi_bind_event_handler(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, if (!r_evt) return -EINVAL; - /* Remove from pending and insert into registered */ + /* + * Remove from pending and insert into registered while getting hold + * of protocol instance. + */ hash_del(&hndl->hash); + /* + * Acquire protocols only for NON pending handlers, so as NOT to trigger + * protocol initialization when a notifier is registered against a still + * not registered protocol, since it would make little sense to force init + * protocols for which still no SCMI driver user exists: they wouldn't + * emit any event anyway till some SCMI driver starts using it. + */ + scmi_protocol_acquire(ni->handle, KEY_XTRACT_PROTO_ID(hndl->key)); hndl->r_evt = r_evt; + mutex_lock(&r_evt->proto->registered_mtx); hash_add(r_evt->proto->registered_events_handlers, &hndl->hash, hndl->key); @@ -1193,41 +1206,65 @@ static int scmi_disable_events(struct scmi_event_handler *hndl) * * unregister and free the handler itself * * Context: Assumes all the proper locking has been managed by the caller. + * + * Return: True if handler was freed (users dropped to zero) */ -static void scmi_put_handler_unlocked(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, +static bool scmi_put_handler_unlocked(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, struct scmi_event_handler *hndl) { + bool freed = false; + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&hndl->users)) { if (!IS_HNDL_PENDING(hndl)) scmi_disable_events(hndl); scmi_free_event_handler(hndl); + freed = true; } + + return freed; } static void scmi_put_handler(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, struct scmi_event_handler *hndl) { + bool freed; + u8 protocol_id; struct scmi_registered_event *r_evt = hndl->r_evt; mutex_lock(&ni->pending_mtx); - if (r_evt) + if (r_evt) { + protocol_id = r_evt->proto->id; mutex_lock(&r_evt->proto->registered_mtx); + } - scmi_put_handler_unlocked(ni, hndl); + freed = scmi_put_handler_unlocked(ni, hndl); - if (r_evt) + if (r_evt) { mutex_unlock(&r_evt->proto->registered_mtx); + /* + * Only registered handler acquired protocol; must be here + * released only AFTER unlocking registered_mtx, since + * releasing a protocol can trigger its de-initialization + * (ie. including r_evt and registered_mtx) + */ + if (freed) + scmi_protocol_release(ni->handle, protocol_id); + } mutex_unlock(&ni->pending_mtx); } static void scmi_put_active_handler(struct scmi_notify_instance *ni, struct scmi_event_handler *hndl) { + bool freed; struct scmi_registered_event *r_evt = hndl->r_evt; + u8 protocol_id = r_evt->proto->id; mutex_lock(&r_evt->proto->registered_mtx); - scmi_put_handler_unlocked(ni, hndl); + freed = scmi_put_handler_unlocked(ni, hndl); mutex_unlock(&r_evt->proto->registered_mtx); + if (freed) + scmi_protocol_release(ni->handle, protocol_id); } /**