@@ -2192,10 +2192,10 @@ vchiq_get_state(void)
{
if (!g_state.remote)
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: g_state.remote == NULL\n", __func__);
+ pr_err("%s: g_state.remote == NULL\n", __func__);
else if (g_state.remote->initialised != 1)
- printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: g_state.remote->initialised != 1 (%d)\n",
- __func__, g_state.remote->initialised);
+ pr_notice("%s: g_state.remote->initialised != 1 (%d)\n",
+ __func__, g_state.remote->initialised);
return (g_state.remote &&
(g_state.remote->initialised == 1)) ? &g_state : NULL;
This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: fix Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_info([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_info(dev, ... then pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO ... Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com> --- .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)